{"id":66953,"date":"2005-10-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-10-25T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/10\/25\/on-finit-par-sinterroger\/"},"modified":"2005-10-25T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-10-25T00:00:00","slug":"on-finit-par-sinterroger","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/10\/25\/on-finit-par-sinterroger\/","title":{"rendered":"On finit par s’interroger…"},"content":{"rendered":"

Le budget du Pentagone pour 2006 devrait atteindre $470 milliards. L’administration GW devrait lui ajouter, au printemps prochain, dans une d\u00e9cision inattendue que tout le monde pr\u00e9voit, une somme de $50 milliards pour frais de guerre impr\u00e9vus (l’Irak). Cela fera $520 milliards, avec une possible rallonge suppl\u00e9mentaire \u00e0 l’automne. 2006 pourrait \u00eatre boucl\u00e9 avec un budget du Pentagone pour l’ann\u00e9e de $550 milliards. Encore s’agit-il du budget officiel auquel il faudrait rajouter les budgets du d\u00e9partement de l’\u00c9nergie (nucl\u00e9aire), du renseignement, etc., pour avoir un volume plus r\u00e9aliste des d\u00e9penses de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale ; les \u00e9conomistes tatillons rajoutent m\u00eame le service de la dette que ces d\u00e9penses occasionnent au budget f\u00e9d\u00e9ral. Le trillion annuel n’est plus si loin qu’on croit<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tEt alors? On entend d’ici les experts europ\u00e9ens bien inform\u00e9s et partisans d’une d\u00e9fense forte se p\u00e2mer d’admiration pour ces courageuses d\u00e9penses de d\u00e9fense.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tR\u00e9p\u00e9tons notre question : et alors? Car le caract\u00e8re le plus surprenant de cette situation, que nous soulignons souvent<\/a>, est que le Pentagone arrive \u00e0 fournir de moins en moins, \u00e0 mesure qu’il re\u00e7oit de plus en plus. On commence \u00e0 s’en aviser dans les \u00e9crits favoris des milieux du complexe militaro-industriel, et jusqu’au Congr\u00e8s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDefense News du 24 octobre<\/a> note ceci:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Somehow, more and more money seems to buy less and less at the Pentagon.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Costs for weapons and personnel pay and benefits are outpacing even the fast-rising defense budget. There’s going to be some kind of a crunch, warned Sen. John McCain, who is leading a Senate effort to force acquisition reform on the Pentagon to control spiraling weapon costs.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb We are already at a point where we can only acquire four ships for the United States Navy in one year, the Arizona Republican said. That obviously has significant national security implications over time.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb As escalating prices undermine the Pentagon’s buying power, broader government budget problems threaten to stifle defense budget growth.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 25 octobre 2005 \u00e0 09H07<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le budget du Pentagone pour 2006 devrait atteindre $470 milliards. L’administration GW devrait lui ajouter, au printemps prochain, dans une d\u00e9cision inattendue que tout le monde pr\u00e9voit, une somme de $50 milliards pour frais de guerre impr\u00e9vus (l’Irak). Cela fera $520 milliards, avec une possible rallonge suppl\u00e9mentaire \u00e0 l’automne. 2006 pourrait \u00eatre boucl\u00e9 avec un… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3127,4544,4063,3194],"class_list":["post-66953","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-budget","tag-gaspillage","tag-mccain","tag-pentagone"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66953","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66953"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66953\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}