{"id":66973,"date":"2005-11-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-02T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/02\/silvio-george-na-plus-confiance\/"},"modified":"2005-11-02T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-11-02T00:00:00","slug":"silvio-george-na-plus-confiance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/02\/silvio-george-na-plus-confiance\/","title":{"rendered":"Silvio, George n’a plus confiance\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rapide comme l’\u00e9clair, GW a ripost\u00e9. Ou plut\u00f4t, il a fait dire<\/a>. Un fid\u00e8le, David Frum, qui fut speechwriter<\/em> \u00e0 la Maison-Blanche et qui est l’auteur de la formule axis of evil<\/em>, a expliqu\u00e9 \u00e0 La Stampa<\/em> comment et pourquoi GW a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9\u00e7u par son ex-ami Silvio. D’une fa\u00e7on remarquable, l’interview a paru lundi, le jour o\u00f9 \u00e9taient diffus\u00e9es les remarques de Berlusconi sur ses tentatives de dissuader GW de partir en guerre<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tGlacial, David Frum… \u00ab What Berlusconi said has damaged his personal relationship with Bush. In politics, it sometimes good to be cynical, but not to appear cynical. Berluconi’s words and their meaning seemed very cynical.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb The Bush administration’ perception of Berlusconi has long been very positive. Bush it plain that he enjoyed his company and appreciated the sacrifices Italy has made in the war on terror. But maybe Bush thought Berlusconi a stronger leader than he actually is. I think that from now on, it will be very difficult for the president to confide in Berlusconi, to believe and trust him.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa r\u00e9ception de Berlusconi \u00e0 la Maison-Blanche, ce m\u00eame 31 octobre, a \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9galement glaciale, derri\u00e8re les fanfreluches diplomatiques<\/a>. GW n’aime pas qu’on lui fasse faux-bond. Les copains c’est les copains, autant dans l’adversit\u00e9 que dans l’ivresse guerri\u00e8re.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’\u00e9pisode, de peu d’importance politique, sert \u00e0 confirmer que, face aux pressions de l’infortune washingtonienne type-Plamegate, GW n’a s\u00fbrement pas l’intention d’en rabattre. Cette attitude correspond \u00e0 sa psychologie, notamment sa certitude d’\u00eatre juste et dans le droit chemin. Cette personnalit\u00e9 qui n’a pas le go\u00fbt des nuances ni celui du compromis devrait en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral poursuivre dans le sens de l’intransigeance politique qui caract\u00e9rise sa vision de la situation, autant \u00e0 Washington que dans le monde.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 2 novembre 2005 \u00e0 06H30<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rapide comme l’\u00e9clair, GW a ripost\u00e9. Ou plut\u00f4t, il a fait dire. Un fid\u00e8le, David Frum, qui fut speechwriter \u00e0 la Maison-Blanche et qui est l’auteur de la formule axis of evil, a expliqu\u00e9 \u00e0 La Stampa comment et pourquoi GW a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9\u00e7u par son ex-ami Silvio. D’une fa\u00e7on remarquable, l’interview a paru lundi,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66973","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66973","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66973"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66973\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66973"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66973"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}