{"id":66984,"date":"2005-11-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-04T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/04\/battra-t-il-nixon\/"},"modified":"2005-11-04T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-11-04T00:00:00","slug":"battra-t-il-nixon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/04\/battra-t-il-nixon\/","title":{"rendered":"Battra-t-il Nixon?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>GW Bush est sur la voie d&rsquo;\u00e9ventuellement descendre plus bas que Nixon dans les sondages. Il a du temps pour cela, et Plamegate n&rsquo;a pas encore atteint le rythme de croisi\u00e8re de Watergate comme machine \u00e0 d\u00e9truire le Pr\u00e9sident.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tGW a atteint un pourcentage de 35% d&rsquo;opinion favorable dans le dernier sondage CBS <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wpherald.com\/storyview.php?StoryID=20051103-092109-7542r\" class=\"gen\">publi\u00e9 jeudi<\/a>. Il y a 57% d&rsquo;opinions d\u00e9favorables.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCheney fait encore mieux. Il perd 9 points et atteint 19% d&rsquo;opinions favorables. Le Congr\u00e8s est juste en-dessous de GW, avec 34% d&rsquo;opinions favorables. On peut toujours plaider, pour se faire un peu de bonheur d&rsquo;une illusion, que tous ces gens ne sont pas des d\u00e9magogues; mais l&rsquo;on sait bien qu&rsquo;ils le sont plus que tout ce qu&rsquo;on peut imaginer et qu&rsquo;ils sont, par cons\u00e9quent, les d\u00e9magogues les plus incomp\u00e9tents du monde.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 4 novembre 2005 \u00e0 20H00<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>GW Bush est sur la voie d&rsquo;\u00e9ventuellement descendre plus bas que Nixon dans les sondages. Il a du temps pour cela, et Plamegate n&rsquo;a pas encore atteint le rythme de croisi\u00e8re de Watergate comme machine \u00e0 d\u00e9truire le Pr\u00e9sident. GW a atteint un pourcentage de 35% d&rsquo;opinion favorable dans le dernier sondage CBS publi\u00e9 jeudi.&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1492],"class_list":["post-66984","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-sondages"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66984","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66984"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66984\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}