{"id":67011,"date":"2005-11-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-14T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/14\/le-post-se-prepare-a-la-bagarre-et-confirme-limplication-de-la-pologne-et-de-la-roumanie-dans-le-cias-gulag\/"},"modified":"2005-11-14T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-11-14T00:00:00","slug":"le-post-se-prepare-a-la-bagarre-et-confirme-limplication-de-la-pologne-et-de-la-roumanie-dans-le-cias-gulag","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/14\/le-post-se-prepare-a-la-bagarre-et-confirme-limplication-de-la-pologne-et-de-la-roumanie-dans-le-cias-gulag\/","title":{"rendered":"Le Post<\/em> se pr\u00e9pare \u00e0 la bagarre\u2026 et confirme l’implication de la Pologne et de la Roumanie dans le \u201cCIA’s Gulag<\/em>\u201d?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Comme nous l’indiquons par ailleurs (voir notre F&C du jour<\/a>), l’affaire des black sites<\/em> de la CIA r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9e par le Washington Post<\/em> le 2 novembre pourrait bien se transformer en scandale majeur, un \u00e9quivalent de Plamegate. C’est ce que le Washington Post<\/em> reconna\u00eet sans ambages dans un article publi\u00e9 ce matin<\/a>, sous le titre: \u00ab CIA Article Sidebar: A Story of Deja Vu Some Critics See a Plame Parallel.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’article admet que cette affaire, avec le journal comme avec la journaliste (Dana Priest) qui a \u00e9crit l’article, pourrait conduire au m\u00eame cas que le New York Times<\/em> et Judith Miller dans le scandale Plamegate : \u00ab With the House intelligence committee launching an investigation into the leak of classified information and the CIA referring the matter to the Justice Department, the controversy could mushroom into another Valerie Plame fracas. If prosecutors get involved, Priest could face the same dilemma that confronted Time’s Matt Cooper and former New York Times reporter Judith Miller: whether to reveal confidential sources under threat of imprisonment.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tA la lumi\u00e8re de cet article, on notera deux choses:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• Cette publication elle-m\u00eame signale que le Post<\/em> prend l’affaire tr\u00e8s au s\u00e9rieux, qu’il juge que l’enqu\u00eate lanc\u00e9e par le Congr\u00e8s sur les fuites ayant abouti \u00e0 l’article de Priest est s\u00e9rieuse, qu’il va devoir affronter une attaque en r\u00e8gle et qu’il le fera avec vigueur. Nous voil\u00e0 confirm\u00e9s dans l’importance probable des retomb\u00e9es de cette affaire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• On sait que le Post<\/em> conna\u00eet de source directe (CIA) les noms des pays de l’ex-Europe communiste impliqu\u00e9s mais qu’il ne les a pas publi\u00e9s. Cette remarque faite dans l’article \u00e0 propos d’une publication du Financial Times<\/em> constitue une confirmation, involontaire? Volontaire? des noms des deux pays impliqu\u00e9s, la Pologne et la Roumanie tels que les d\u00e9signe l’article du FT : \u00ab Peter Kornbluh, senior analyst at the nonprofit National Security Archive, calls Priest a brilliant reporter and says she and The Post deserve credit for groundbreaking work, and her sources deserve credit for being courageous, too. But he sharply criticizes the paper’s decision not to name the Eastern European countries, two of which were later identified by the Financial Times and other news outlets, citing information from the group Human Rights Watch.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tC’est autour de l’implication de ces deux pays que des pr\u00e9cisions sont d\u00e9sormais \u00e0 attendre \u00e0 Washington, dans le cadre des suites pol\u00e9miques de cette affaire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 14 novembre 2005 \u00e0 13H36<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Comme nous l’indiquons par ailleurs (voir notre F&C du jour), l’affaire des black sites de la CIA r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9e par le Washington Post le 2 novembre pourrait bien se transformer en scandale majeur, un \u00e9quivalent de Plamegate. C’est ce que le Washington Post reconna\u00eet sans ambages dans un article publi\u00e9 ce matin, sous le titre: \u00ab… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67011","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67011"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67011\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}