{"id":67019,"date":"2005-11-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/17\/les-neocons-nexploitent-pas-la-these-islamiste\/"},"modified":"2005-11-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-11-17T00:00:00","slug":"les-neocons-nexploitent-pas-la-these-islamiste","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/17\/les-neocons-nexploitent-pas-la-these-islamiste\/","title":{"rendered":"Les neocons<\/em> n’exploitent pas la th\u00e8se islamiste"},"content":{"rendered":"

Un article mis en ligne mardi 15 novembre<\/a> sur le site du Weekly Standard<\/em> montre que les n\u00e9o-conservateurs n’ont pas exploit\u00e9 tr\u00e8s loin l’interpr\u00e9tation d’une pouss\u00e9e islamiste comme cause de la crise des banlieues en France. L’article appr\u00e9cie cette crise du point de vue de la criminalit\u00e9, en en faisant un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne en pointe d’une criminalit\u00e9 compl\u00e8tement incontr\u00f4lable en Europe (au contraire des USA, bien entendu).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Rioters in France have torched thousands of cars, injured scores of police, burned and shattered dozens of buildings, and killed at least one person. Not knowing what to make of it all, Americans may be forgiven if they file this away as an event that has nothing to do with normal life in France in particular and Europe in general. After all, U.S. media coverage routinely portrays Western Europe as a much more civil place than America. But that stereotype is badly out of date. Granted, riots like these are unusual, but they are taking place amidst rising crime that has left many European countries more uncivil than we often think, much more dangerous than in the past, and in important ways more crime-ridden than the United States. Europeans are now saddled with a crime problem that has been building for years and isn’t disappearing anytime soon–alongside their high unemployment, slower growth, and social strains that were evident long before the recent round of rioting.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn sait que la premi\u00e8re interpr\u00e9tation<\/a> (quoique assez tardive) du Weekly Standard<\/em> avait \u00e9t\u00e9 de faire de la crise une pouss\u00e9e indirecte de l’islamisme, conduisant ainsi \u00e0 la logique d’attendre de la France qu’elle se rallie au camp de l’anti-terrorisme radical dont l’hebdomadaire est lui-m\u00eame un des moteurs. Cette fois, l’article adopte au contraire une appr\u00e9ciation critique de la France (mais non singularis\u00e9e, mise au contraire dans le cadre europ\u00e9en) par comparaison avec les USA, c\u00e9l\u00e9br\u00e9s comme ayant r\u00e9solu le probl\u00e8me de la d\u00e9linquance. C’est une variante appliqu\u00e9e \u00e0 la criminalit\u00e9 de la th\u00e8se Mars et V\u00e9nus (les USA sont sur Mars, ils sont durs ; l’Europe est sur V\u00e9nus, elle est molle) de Robert Kagan.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe Weekly Standard<\/em> reste pourtant prudent. L’article n’est pas d’un de ses r\u00e9dacteurs mais d’un collaborateur ext\u00e9rieur (Gerard Alexander, professeur associ\u00e9 \u00e0 l’Universit\u00e9 de Virginie). Les opinions exprim\u00e9es peuvent, si n\u00e9cessaire, \u00eatre pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es comme n’\u00e9tant pas directement celles de l’hebdomadaire. Cela marque une incertitude et rend compte d’un certain flottement dans le jugement que les n\u00e9o-conservateurs portent sur cette crise.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 17 novembre 2005 \u00e0 15H36<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Un article mis en ligne mardi 15 novembre sur le site du Weekly Standard montre que les n\u00e9o-conservateurs n’ont pas exploit\u00e9 tr\u00e8s loin l’interpr\u00e9tation d’une pouss\u00e9e islamiste comme cause de la crise des banlieues en France. L’article appr\u00e9cie cette crise du point de vue de la criminalit\u00e9, en en faisant un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne en pointe d’une… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4825,3333,3332],"class_list":["post-67019","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-banlieues","tag-standard","tag-weekly"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67019","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67019"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67019\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67019"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67019"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67019"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}