{"id":67022,"date":"2005-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/18\/un-message-subliminal-la-reference-francaise\/"},"modified":"2005-11-18T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-11-18T00:00:00","slug":"un-message-subliminal-la-reference-francaise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/18\/un-message-subliminal-la-reference-francaise\/","title":{"rendered":"Un message subliminal: la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence fran\u00e7aise"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Nous citons \u00e0 nouveau cette phrase d&rsquo;un article de <em>Aviation Week &#038; Space Technology<\/em>, repris dans un <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2166\" class=\"gen\">Faits &#038; Commentaires de ce jour<\/a> sur les rapports agit\u00e9s et quasi-incestueux du F\/A-22 et du F-35\/JSF: \u00ab <em>Why run the risk of taking the F\/A-22 line down before we really demonstrate the operational concept of the JSF? the program official says. What message would that send to China? What message would that send to France&rsquo;s aerospace industry? Furthermore, bridge funding would calm the industrial base for shared or similar equipment, like the advanced radars and raw materials for both platforms.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tNous invitons nos lecteurs \u00e0 noter que cette phrase est l&rsquo;argumentaire d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 de fa\u00e7on abrupte par une source de AW&#038;ST (revue US la plus s\u00e9rieuse possible en ce domaine) en faveur de la poursuite de la production du F\/A-22 jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 l&rsquo;arriv\u00e9e du JSF en production, pour ne pas risquer que les USA perdent leurs capacit\u00e9s de production en mati\u00e8re d&rsquo;avions de combat. Qu&rsquo;on se rende compte, dit en substance cette source, ce que penseraient les principaux, les seuls acteurs importants du domaine! Ces principaux acteurs sont au nombre de trois, et nous traduisons :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t&bull; La Chine, principale puissance militaire concurrente \u00e0 venir ;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t&bull; L&rsquo;industrie a\u00e9rospatiale fran\u00e7aise Seule concurrente r\u00e9elle de l&rsquo;industrie a\u00e9rospatiale US. (Ne parlons pas des Britanniques, <em>please<\/em>, \u00e0 la d\u00e9rive de leur gloire pass\u00e9e, du temps d&rsquo;avant-Tony Blair.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t&bull; Cette m\u00eame industrie a\u00e9rospatiale US, \u00e9videmment int\u00e9ress\u00e9e \u00e0 garder ses capacit\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tVoici donc le message, dans une intervention \u00e0 l&#8217;emporte-pi\u00e8ce, presque r\u00e9flexe, et ainsi refl\u00e9tant bien plus qu&rsquo;une analyse pes\u00e9e (et orient\u00e9e) la r\u00e9elle appr\u00e9ciation des sp\u00e9cialistes de l&rsquo;a\u00e9ronautique US, particuli\u00e8rement dans l&rsquo;industrie : il n&rsquo;existe aujourd&rsquo;hui qu&rsquo;<strong>une seule industrie<\/strong> qui puisse \u00eatre compar\u00e9e \u00e0 l&rsquo;industrie a\u00e9rospatiale US, et c&rsquo;est la fran\u00e7aise. Cela ne nous \u00e9tonne pas, nous en sommes persuad\u00e9s depuis longtemps. Cela nous agace, par contre, d&rsquo;entendre et de lire les litanies sur la France r\u00e9trograde, ringarde, d\u00e9cadente, etc.,  d&rsquo;autant que, comme nul ne l&rsquo;ignore, l&rsquo;excellence de l&rsquo;industrie a\u00e9rospatiale fran\u00e7aise est un exemple parmi d&rsquo;autres de la capacit\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise dans ces domaines technologiques avanc\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 18 novembre 2005 \u00e0 06H06<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nous citons \u00e0 nouveau cette phrase d&rsquo;un article de Aviation Week &#038; Space Technology, repris dans un Faits &#038; Commentaires de ce jour sur les rapports agit\u00e9s et quasi-incestueux du F\/A-22 et du F-35\/JSF: \u00ab Why run the risk of taking the F\/A-22 line down before we really demonstrate the operational concept of the JSF?&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4195,4843,250,4247],"class_list":["post-67022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-aviation","tag-f22","tag-jsf","tag-week"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}