{"id":67035,"date":"2005-11-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-22T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/22\/nous-compatissons-indeed\/"},"modified":"2005-11-22T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-11-22T00:00:00","slug":"nous-compatissons-indeed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/22\/nous-compatissons-indeed\/","title":{"rendered":"Nous compatissons, indeed<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Dans une note discr\u00e8te (dans News Brief : Around the World<\/em>), l’hebdomadaire Aviation Week & Space Technology<\/a> mentionne l’angoisse grandissante des coop\u00e9rants non-US dans le programme JSF. Cette angoisse est li\u00e9e \u00e0 l’\u00e9volution de la QDR, qui se fait au milieu des rumeurs nombreuses de r\u00e9duction sensible du programme. (La derni\u00e8re, venue d’un de nos lecteurs [Denis Leblanc] aussi bien que de Aerospace Daily & Defense Report<\/em> et du Wall Street Journal<\/em> de ce matin porte sur la liquidation de la version USAF du JSF, l’USAF \u00e9tant invit\u00e9e \u00e0 commander du JSF version U.S. Navy. Nous commenterons plus en d\u00e9tails les implications de cette possible d\u00e9cision.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici ce que AW&ST nous dit : \u00ab As the Pentagon moves into the final stages of its Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) the four-year assessment of U.S. military strategy possible cutbacks in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program are worrying international partners now working on the $60-billion project to build the next-generation combat aircraft.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb The emphasis on cost control and price was one of the JSF’s main attractions for potential international customers. With suggestions that U.S. tactical aircraft, including the Lockheed Martin-led JSF program, could take a 30% hit as a result of the QDR, concerns are growing that this could lead to several hundred aircraft being cut from U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps requirements. Once you start down this route you need to rebaseline the program and the unit price starts to rise, from $45 million for a conventional takeoff and landing version to nearer $100 million, claims one European procurement official. A lot depends on how you do the math, but bottom line is you end up like the F-22 Raptor with dwindling numbers, massive price escalation and no one able to afford the aircraft.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tNous compatissons, le plus chr\u00e9tiennement du monde. Nous n’irons pas jusqu’\u00e0 faire le jacques, avec une remarque du genre I told you so<\/em>. Tout de m\u00eame, le jour o\u00f9 les choses seront affreusement claires, certains m\u00e9riteraient d’\u00eatre remis devant leurs espoirs et leurs d\u00e9clarations par rapport \u00e0 l’\u00e9vidence des pr\u00e9visions qu’on pouvait faire concernant le programme JSF. (En 1997, avant la premi\u00e8re QDR qui r\u00e9duisit l’intention de commande du JSF de 3.000 \u00e0 2.841 unit\u00e9s, le GAO situait le prix r\u00e9el projet\u00e9 du JSF \u00e0 $73 millions l’exemplaire et non $29-$40 selon les versions. Depuis cette estimation n’a cess\u00e9 d’augmenter et le GAO [avril 2005] est autour de $100 millions l’exemplaire.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 22 novembre 2005 \u00e0 16H00<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dans une note discr\u00e8te (dans News Brief : Around the World), l’hebdomadaire Aviation Week & Space Technology mentionne l’angoisse grandissante des coop\u00e9rants non-US dans le programme JSF. Cette angoisse est li\u00e9e \u00e0 l’\u00e9volution de la QDR, qui se fait au milieu des rumeurs nombreuses de r\u00e9duction sensible du programme. (La derni\u00e8re, venue d’un de nos… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4851,250,4482],"class_list":["post-67035","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-awst","tag-jsf","tag-qdr"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67035","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67035"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67035\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67035"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67035"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67035"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}