{"id":67037,"date":"2005-11-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/23\/to-bomb-or-not-to-bomb-to-joke-or-not-to-joke-to-publish-or-not-to-publish\/"},"modified":"2005-11-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-11-23T00:00:00","slug":"to-bomb-or-not-to-bomb-to-joke-or-not-to-joke-to-publish-or-not-to-publish","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/23\/to-bomb-or-not-to-bomb-to-joke-or-not-to-joke-to-publish-or-not-to-publish\/","title":{"rendered":"<em>To bomb or not to bomb<\/em>? <em>To joke or not to joke<\/em>? <em>To publish or not to publish<\/em>?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le d\u00e9bat sur la guerre d&rsquo;Irak a atteint un nouveau domaine. Apr\u00e8s la trag\u00e9die, la d\u00e9sinformation, le virtualisme, les scandales, nous sommes dans le domaine incertain qui c\u00f4toie le gag (en fran\u00e7ais et en anglais),  mais qui n&rsquo;en est pas un puisqu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit du projet de bombardement de GW Bush de la station de TV Al Jazeera. (Un lecteur anonyme du site <a href=\"http:\/\/english.aljazeera.net\/NR\/exeres\/326255B5-5F1F-467A-8B3E-1C3B94A99A3E.htm\" class=\"gen\">Al Jazeera.com<\/a> a ce commentaire: \u00ab <em>This doesn&rsquo;t surprise me. Whenever there is truth  unpleasant truth  it seems this administration wants to bomb it.<\/em> \u00bb).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tOn parle de la publication par le <em>Daily Mirror<\/em> d&rsquo;une partie d&rsquo;un m\u00e9morandum secret du 10 Downing Street sur un accrochage s\u00e9rieux entre Bush et Blair. Cela se passe en avril 2004. Bush veut bombarder le si\u00e8ge d&rsquo;Al Jazeera au Qatar. Blair le convainc de n&rsquo;en rien faire. Le <em>Mirror<\/em> publie des extraits le 22 novembre. Quelques heures plus tard, il est pr\u00e9venu que s&rsquo;il continue \u00e0 publier, il sera assign\u00e9. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/Iraq\/Story\/0,2763,1648590,00.html\" class=\"gen\">C&rsquo;est une premi\u00e8re<\/a> pour ce gouvernement britannique. Le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mirror.co.uk\/news\/tm_objectid=16401707%26method=full%26siteid=94762%26headline=law%2dchief%2dgags%2dthe%2dmirror%2don%2dbush%2dleak%2d-name_page.html\" class=\"gen\">Mirror lui-m\u00eame<\/a> explique aujourd&rsquo;hui:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>The Daily Mirror was yesterday told not to publish further details from a top secret memo, which revealed that President Bush wanted to bomb an Arab TV station. The gag by the Attorney General Lord Goldsmith came nearly 24 hours after the Mirror informed Downing Street of its intention to reveal how Tony Blair talked Bush out of attacking satellite station al-Jazeera&rsquo;s HQ in friendly Qatar. No 10 did nothing to stop us publishing our front page exclusive yesterday.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes commentaires et r\u00e9actions recueillis par le <em>Mirror<\/em> ont \u00e9t\u00e9 divers. \u00ab <em>The Mirror quoted an unnamed British government official as saying Bush&rsquo;s threat was humorous, not serious.<\/em> \u00bb, \u00e9crit <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/afp\/20051122\/wl_uk_afp\/qatarusbritainmediajazeera_051122073919\" class=\"gen\">l&rsquo;agence AFP<\/a>. Le site <a href=\"http:\/\/english.aljazeera.net\/NR\/exeres\/FA5DC791-B0D3-418E-9946-87162E6C6EC1.htm\" class=\"gen\">Al Jazeera.com<\/a>, premier int\u00e9ress\u00e9, rapporte: \u00ab <em>A source told the Mirror: The memo is explosive and hugely damaging to Bush. He made clear he wanted to bomb Aljazeera in Qatar and elsewhere. Blair replied that would cause a big problem. There&rsquo;s no doubt what Bush wanted to do  and no doubt Blair didn&rsquo;t want him to do it.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tHier, le <em>Daily Mirror<\/em> titrait: \u00ab <em>Bush plot to bomb his ally<\/em> \u00bb (le Qatar, en l&rsquo;occurrence, o\u00f9 se trouvent install\u00e9es des bases US et britanniques). Le porte-parole du parti lib\u00e9ral britannique, Sir Menzies Campbell, observe : \u00ab <em>If true, then this underlines the desperation of the Bush administration as events in Iraq began to spiral out of control. On this occasion, the prime minister may have been successful in averting political disaster, but it shows how dangerous his relationship with President Bush has been.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa r\u00e9alit\u00e9, pour notre compte et dans une premi\u00e8re r\u00e9action, est que cette r\u00e9v\u00e9lation nous transporte au-del\u00e0 de l&rsquo;information et du commentaire. Elle nous laisse <em>speechless<\/em>, tant elle nous installe dans un univers qu&rsquo;on croyait jusqu&rsquo;ici r\u00e9serv\u00e9 aux caricaturistes et aux surr\u00e9alistes quand ils \u00e9taient actifs. Nos gouvernants ressuscitent la caricature surr\u00e9aliste.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 23 novembre 2005 \u00e0 06H50<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le d\u00e9bat sur la guerre d&rsquo;Irak a atteint un nouveau domaine. Apr\u00e8s la trag\u00e9die, la d\u00e9sinformation, le virtualisme, les scandales, nous sommes dans le domaine incertain qui c\u00f4toie le gag (en fran\u00e7ais et en anglais), mais qui n&rsquo;en est pas un puisqu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit du projet de bombardement de GW Bush de la station de TV&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4853,2870,705,868,3015,3617,3618],"class_list":["post-67037","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-aljazeera","tag-attaque","tag-blair","tag-bush","tag-communication","tag-daily","tag-mirror"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67037"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67037\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}