{"id":67039,"date":"2005-11-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/23\/le-long-geignement-discretement-indigne-de-la-vieille-dame-tres-digne-le-financial-times\/"},"modified":"2005-11-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-11-23T00:00:00","slug":"le-long-geignement-discretement-indigne-de-la-vieille-dame-tres-digne-le-financial-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/11\/23\/le-long-geignement-discretement-indigne-de-la-vieille-dame-tres-digne-le-financial-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Le long geignement discr\u00e8tement indign\u00e9 de la vieille dame tr\u00e8s digne (le <em>Financial Times<\/em>)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le titre nous dit tout, absolument tout : \u00ab <em>No way for America to treat its close allies.<\/em> \u00bb (Traduisons pour la francophonie, en langage convivial: Ce n&rsquo;est pas une fa\u00e7on pour l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique de traiter ses amis intimes.)  C&rsquo;est le titre de l&rsquo;\u00e9dito du <em>Financial Times<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/news.ft.com\/cms\/s\/cdcf3bec-5bc6-11da-b221-0000779e2340.html\" class=\"gen\">du jour<\/a> et il est possible qu&rsquo;en le bouclant, quelque <em>gentleman<\/em> ou l&rsquo;autre se soit demand\u00e9, subitement angoiss\u00e9, s&rsquo;il n&rsquo;allait pas encourir quelque terrible courroux. Aux derni\u00e8res nouvelles, Washington n&rsquo;a pas encore d\u00e9cha\u00een\u00e9 le feu du ciel sur le FT-saumon.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tQue se passe-t-il? Depuis 5 ans, Londres n\u00e9gocie avec Washington, avec un comparse anglo-saxon (l&rsquo;Australie), un traitement sp\u00e9cial dans le r\u00e9gime ITAR de contr\u00f4le de l&rsquo;exportation des technologies de l&rsquo;armement. C&rsquo;est un enjeu vital pour ne pas \u00eatre trait\u00e9 comme un vulgaire Cingalais ou un vulgaire Berlusconi, au milieu des labyrinthes bureaucratiques, des impr\u00e9cations des s\u00e9nateurs maximalistes et <em>tutti quanti<\/em>. La r\u00e9ponse est: <em>nyet<\/em>, apr\u00e8s 5 ans de n\u00e9gociations<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tNous reviendrons sur le sujet, qui le m\u00e9rite. En attendant, le premier paragraphe de l&rsquo;\u00e9dito suffit \u00e0 dire toute leur peine,  et \u00e0 comprendre l&rsquo;extr\u00eame perplexit\u00e9 o\u00f9 l&rsquo;on se trouve de comprendre comment cette qu\u00eate d\u00e9sesp\u00e9r\u00e9e du Graal (la coop\u00e9ration avec les USA) se poursuit, encore et encore \u00ab <em>The US sometimes has difficulty in being nice to its friends. An illustration of this comes in the area of military technology transfer where, again, it just takes one well-placed congressman  in this case, Henry Hyde, who chairs the House international affairs committee  to thwart Bush administration promises to improve technology co-operation with the UK. Mr Hyde refuses to let Britain (and Australia, an equally close American ally) get the promised waiver from US arms trade controls on the grounds of the inadequacy of their own arms trade controls.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 23 novembre 2005 \u00e0 15H32<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le titre nous dit tout, absolument tout : \u00ab No way for America to treat its close allies. \u00bb (Traduisons pour la francophonie, en langage convivial: Ce n&rsquo;est pas une fa\u00e7on pour l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique de traiter ses amis intimes.) C&rsquo;est le titre de l&rsquo;\u00e9dito du Financial Times du jour et il est possible qu&rsquo;en le bouclant,&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3285,872,4793],"class_list":["post-67039","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-congres","tag-hyde","tag-itar"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67039","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67039"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67039\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}