Le directeur de la station de t\u00e9l\u00e9vision et groupe d’information Al Jazeera est \u00e0 Londres depuis hier pour avoir des explications sur le document<\/a> selon lequel GW Bush avait l’intention de lancer une attaque contre le si\u00e8ge d’Al Jazeera. La presse (le Daily Mirror<\/a>) en a publi\u00e9 des extraits.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab I have come to London in order to reach out to British officials, to investigate about the memo that some claim exists during the past week, Al Jazeera managing director Waddah Khanfar told Reuters by telephone after his arrival in London. It is a matter of deep concern for all of us in al Jazeera, and the Arab world and the media. He said a delegation from the channel would deliver a letter to Blair on Saturday asking for an interview.<\/em> […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb People should know the facts about it. It is not a matter that can be brushed away or dealt with in very vague statements, <\/em>[Waddah Khanfar said.] We demand to know the facts about this document and we demand a (cessation) of all kinds of accusations from the American administration. Asked if he thought it was true that Bush wanted to bomb the station, Khanfar said: We are going to suspend any judgment until we find out if that document is correct or not. But I can say we were attacked twice, once in Kabul and once in Baghdad, and two of our colleagues were killed.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 26 novembre 2005 \u00e0 09H05<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Le directeur de la station de t\u00e9l\u00e9vision et groupe d’information Al Jazeera est \u00e0 Londres depuis hier pour avoir des explications sur le document selon lequel GW Bush avait l’intention de lancer une attaque contre le si\u00e8ge d’Al Jazeera. La presse (le Daily Mirror) en a publi\u00e9 des extraits. \u00ab I have come to London… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3617,3618,4859],"class_list":["post-67048","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-daily","tag-mirror","tag-qatar"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67048","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67048"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67048\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67048"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67048"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67048"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}