neocon<\/em>-interventionniste. (Cet antagonisme est une chose av\u00e9r\u00e9e, ainsi que l’hostilit\u00e9 Tenet-Cheney. La th\u00e8se repose sur des fondations solides.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tOn sait que le centre de l’affaire Plame est la r\u00e9v\u00e9lation publique du statut d’officier de la CIA de Valerie Plame, femme de l’ambassadeur Joe Wilson qui enqu\u00eata en 2002 pour savoir si Saddam complotait pour avoir de l’uranium au Niger. (Wilson avait ramen\u00e9 un rapport n\u00e9gatif du Niger ; il avait ensuite d\u00e9nonc\u00e9 l’utilisation publique, par l’administration, d’une information dont il avait v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 qu’elle \u00e9tait infond\u00e9e. La r\u00e9v\u00e9lation publique du statut de sa femme, ce qui est un crime f\u00e9d\u00e9ral pour un officier covert<\/em> de la CIA, avait \u00e9t\u00e9 appr\u00e9ci\u00e9e comme une vengeance du clan Cheney. Cela mena \u00e0 Plamegate et \u00e0 l’inculpation et \u00e0 la d\u00e9mission de Libby, chef de cabinet de Cheney.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLa th\u00e9orie dit simplement que Tenet communiqua \u00e0 Powell, puis Cheney et Bush, toutes les donn\u00e9es de l’enqu\u00eate de Wilson, y compris que la recommandation de s’adresser \u00e0 l’ambassadeur venait de sa femme. Mais il ne pr\u00e9cisa pas que Plame \u00e9tait un officier clandestin (NOC), \u00e0 l’identit\u00e9 cach\u00e9e. Sans pr\u00e9cision, on pouvait effectivement penser que Plame \u00e9tait un officier normal, une analyste de l’Agence, dont l’appartenance n’est pas un secret prot\u00e9g\u00e9 par la loi. Cheney et sa bande auraient rendu son nom public sans mesurer qu’ils commettaient un grave d\u00e9lit f\u00e9d\u00e9ral.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00ab In this ingenious scenario, Tenet could have told top-security-clearance Cheney that Wilson’s wife recommended Wilson for the Niger inquiry, BUT [in the reader’s words] (cough,cough) FAILED TO MENTION’ she was a clandestine N.O.C. working for the operations’ side (not the public CIA analytical side). In this delicious surmise, to use my reader’s words, Did Tenet anticipate that Cheney couldn’t resist using this [item] in a black op’ to hatchet a critic?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb No proof that that’s what happened, of course, but what a reckoning: No wonder when Powell showed Bush and Cheney (only) the INR memo with Plame’s info marked SECRET NFE,’ Cheney (to quote Powell) zeroed in on it!’ At that fateful moment on AF1 (ironically over Africa), Cheney knew he had swallowed Tenet’s poison pill and his ‘kill the messenger’ plan, being implemented by Scooter, was outing’ a secret clandestine CIA operative . . . Surprise, surprise!<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Further delights: as the public knows, after Novak’s column came out, outing a CIA NOC & her front company, it was Tenet himself who carefully reviewed the facts and insisted that the DOJ investigate this treasonous act.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Thus, game, set, match point the CIA wins a 10-year bitter feud with Cheney’s cabal.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 28 novembre 2005 \u00e0 06H38<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Une ing\u00e9nieuse th\u00e9orie, du type si non \u00e8 vero, \u00e8 ben trovato mais qui pourrait bien \u00eatre vraie, d’un lecteur de Margie Burns, collaboratrice de OnLineJournal. Burns nous l’expose dans un article du 26 novembre. La question est de savoir si Tenet, l’ancien patron de la CIA (jusqu’\u00e0 l’\u00e9t\u00e9 2004), n’a pas pi\u00e9g\u00e9 Cheney dans… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4670,4140],"class_list":["post-67052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-plame","tag-wilson"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67052\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}