{"id":67118,"date":"2005-12-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-12-20T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/12\/20\/une-mise-en-accusation-comme-surprise-de-noel\/"},"modified":"2005-12-20T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-12-20T00:00:00","slug":"une-mise-en-accusation-comme-surprise-de-noel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/12\/20\/une-mise-en-accusation-comme-surprise-de-noel\/","title":{"rendered":"Une mise en accusation comme surprise de No\u00ebl?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Jusqu&rsquo;ici, les attaques contre GW Bush impliquant la suggestion d&rsquo;une demande de destitution \u00e9tait le fait d&rsquo;articles pol\u00e9miques, de simples analyses individuelles, etc. Pour la premi\u00e8re fois, la chose est \u00e9voqu\u00e9e publiquement d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on officielle, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire par une personnalit\u00e9 officielle ayant le pouvoir de poser officiellement la question de la mise en accusation menant \u00e0 un vote sur la destitution.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;intervention vient de la s\u00e9natrice d\u00e9mocrate de Californie Barbara Boxer, qui a publi\u00e9 un communiqu\u00e9 hier soir (<a href=\"http:\/\/rawstory.com\/news\/2005\/Senator_says_shes_asked_for_opinions_1219.html\" class=\"gen\">notamment pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par Raw Story<\/a>). (Auparavant, dans la journ\u00e9e d&rsquo;hier, un autre parlementaire avait \u00e9voqu\u00e9 la possibilit\u00e9 de la demande de destitution : John Lewis, repr\u00e9sentant d\u00e9mocrate de Georgie.): \u00ab <em>In a release issued this evening, Boxer said she&rsquo;s asked four presidential scholars for their opinion on impeachment after former White Housel counsel John Dean  made famous by his role in revealing the Watergate tapes  asserted that President Bush had admitted to an impeachable offense.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Boxer isn&rsquo;t the first congressmember today to float the word. Earlier today, Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) said Bush should be impeached if he broke the law in the spying program. The liberal California senator has tangled with Bush before  earlier this year, she challenged the president&rsquo;s Ohio electoral votes.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes remous sont essentiellement provoqu\u00e9s par la reconnaissance par le Pr\u00e9sident qu&rsquo;il fait espionner des Am\u00e9ricains par la NSA depuis 2002, d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on compl\u00e8tement ill\u00e9gale. Le r\u00f4le que joue John Dean, qui fut conseiller juridique de Nixon puis son principal accusateur devant le S\u00e9nat apr\u00e8s qu&rsquo;il ait d\u00e9missionn\u00e9 durant le scandale du Watergate, est tr\u00e8s important dans l&rsquo;actuelle attaque lanc\u00e9e contre Bush. Selon Boxer : \u00ab <em>On Sunday, December 18, former White House Counsel John Dean and I participated in a public discussion that covered many issues, including this surveillance. Mr. Dean, who was President Nixon&rsquo;s counsel at the time of Watergate, said that President Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense. Today, Mr. Dean confirmed his statement.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>This startling assertion by Mr. Dean is especially poignant because he experienced first hand the executive abuse of power and a presidential scandal arising from the surveillance of American citizens.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 20 d\u00e9cembre 2005 \u00e0 13H54<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jusqu&rsquo;ici, les attaques contre GW Bush impliquant la suggestion d&rsquo;une demande de destitution \u00e9tait le fait d&rsquo;articles pol\u00e9miques, de simples analyses individuelles, etc. Pour la premi\u00e8re fois, la chose est \u00e9voqu\u00e9e publiquement d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on officielle, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire par une personnalit\u00e9 officielle ayant le pouvoir de poser officiellement la question de la mise en accusation menant \u00e0&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4910,856,4911,2626],"class_list":["post-67118","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-boxer","tag-dean","tag-destitution","tag-watergate"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67118","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67118"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67118\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67118"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}