{"id":67122,"date":"2005-12-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-12-21T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/12\/21\/lannee-du-jsf-pour-les-britanniques-egalement\/"},"modified":"2005-12-21T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-12-21T00:00:00","slug":"lannee-du-jsf-pour-les-britanniques-egalement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/12\/21\/lannee-du-jsf-pour-les-britanniques-egalement\/","title":{"rendered":"L&rsquo;\u201cann\u00e9e du JSF\u201d pour les Britanniques \u00e9galement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>A bien des \u00e9gards, 2006 est une ann\u00e9e-clef pour le programme JSF. Le point principal est l&rsquo;engagement de commande que Lockheed Martin et le Pentagone veulent obtenir des coop\u00e9rants \u00e9trangers du programme, notamment les cinq pays europ\u00e9ens. Le probl\u00e8me vaut \u00e9galement pour les Britanniques.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDans son num\u00e9ro du 19\/26 d\u00e9cembre, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aviationweek.com\" class=\"gen\">Aviation Week &#038; Space Technology<\/a> passe en revue un document important du minist\u00e8re britannique de la d\u00e9fense sur la protection des capacit\u00e9s technologiques strat\u00e9giques de la nation. Cela nous vaut quelques mots sur le JSF, avec des commentaires du patron de BAE Mike Turner : \u00ab <em>The JSF will have a significant impact on how the new strategy plays out in the air systems sector, one way or another. Turner and Peter Spencer, the British defense procurement czar, visited the U.S. last week, to reiterate the importance of adequate technology access on the F-35 program.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Critical British ambitions for the JSF are set out in the strategy document. The U.K. intends to establish sovereign support capabilities which would provide in-country facilities to maintain, repair and upgrade the U.K. fleet, and an integrated pilot and maintenance training center.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Turner underscores that for the U.K. involvement in JSF, 2006 is a very important year. . . . Operational independence is a big issue. The U.K. government is pushing very hard. . . . If it doesn&rsquo;t get [the required technology access] it will be very interesting to see what decision it takes at the end of next year, when the Defense Ministry is due to commit to production of the F-35.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tA noter que le scepticisme pessimiste et pourtant presque goguenard de Turner s&rsquo;exerce apr\u00e8s une visite aux USA, la semaine derni\u00e8re, sur cette question de l&rsquo;acc\u00e8s aux technologies du JSF. Il para\u00eet justifi\u00e9 de conclure que le r\u00e9sultat de cette visite n&rsquo;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 tr\u00e8s encourageant.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tPubli\u00e9 le 21 d\u00e9cembre 2005 \u00e0 11H32<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A bien des \u00e9gards, 2006 est une ann\u00e9e-clef pour le programme JSF. Le point principal est l&rsquo;engagement de commande que Lockheed Martin et le Pentagone veulent obtenir des coop\u00e9rants \u00e9trangers du programme, notamment les cinq pays europ\u00e9ens. Le probl\u00e8me vaut \u00e9galement pour les Britanniques. Dans son num\u00e9ro du 19\/26 d\u00e9cembre, Aviation Week &#038; Space Technology&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[250,4096,3509,2758],"class_list":["post-67122","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-jsf","tag-technologies","tag-turner","tag-uk"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67122","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67122"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67122\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67122"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67122"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}