{"id":67124,"date":"2005-12-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-12-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/12\/23\/la-loi-et-lesprit-de-la-loi\/"},"modified":"2005-12-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-12-23T00:00:00","slug":"la-loi-et-lesprit-de-la-loi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/12\/23\/la-loi-et-lesprit-de-la-loi\/","title":{"rendered":"La loi et l’esprit de la loi"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’administration GW plaide que le principe d’autorisation des \u00e9coutes ill\u00e9gales de citoyens US aux USA par la NSA se trouve dans la loi vot\u00e9e par le Congr\u00e8s \u00e0 l’automne 2001 et donnant au Pr\u00e9sident des pouvoirs de guerre. Rien d’explicite dans ce sens ne se trouve dans cette loi mais l’administration fait appel implicitement \u00e0 l’ esprit de la loi.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe s\u00e9nateur Tom Daschle, qui \u00e9tait chef de la majorit\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate lorsque fut n\u00e9goci\u00e9 le texte des War Powers<\/em> en 2001, vient de mettre les choses au point. Lui aussi argue de l’esprit de la loi, mais dans le sens contraire. Il rappelle un incident important qui met en lumi\u00e8re que les s\u00e9nateurs n’avaient nullement \u00e0 l’esprit le territoire des USA et les citoyens US comme champ d’application de ces pouvoirs. Le Washington Post<\/em> de ce jour pr\u00e9sente de cette fa\u00e7on l’argument de Daschle, pr\u00e9sent dans un article publi\u00e9 dans le m\u00eame journal : \u00ab Daschle’s article reveals an important new episode in the resolution’s legislative history. As drafted, and as finally passed, the resolution authorized the president to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the Sept. 11 attacks.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Literally minutes before the Senate cast its vote, the administration sought to add the words ‘in the United States and’ after appropriate force’ in the agreed-upon text," Daschle wrote. This last-minute change would have given the president broad authority to exercise expansive powers not just overseas where we all understood he wanted authority to act but right here in the United States, potentially against American citizens. I could see no justification for Congress to accede to this extraordinary request for additional authority. I refused.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Daschle wrote that Congress also rejected draft language from the White House that would have authorized the use of force to deter and pre-empt any future acts of terrorism or aggression against the United States, not only against those responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 23 d\u00e9cembre 2005 \u00e0 11H37<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’administration GW plaide que le principe d’autorisation des \u00e9coutes ill\u00e9gales de citoyens US aux USA par la NSA se trouve dans la loi vot\u00e9e par le Congr\u00e8s \u00e0 l’automne 2001 et donnant au Pr\u00e9sident des pouvoirs de guerre. Rien d’explicite dans ce sens ne se trouve dans cette loi mais l’administration fait appel implicitement \u00e0… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3709,4915,4916,3871,3146,3531,4128],"class_list":["post-67124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-daschle","tag-ecoutes","tag-illegales","tag-nsa","tag-powers","tag-senat","tag-war"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67124"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67124\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}