Un de nos lecteurs (Louis Kuehn, Forum du 8 janvier<\/a>) le note effectivement (\u00ab Merkel: le rapport avec Moscou est un partenariat strat\u00e9gique!<\/em> \u00bb) Les d\u00e9clarations de Angela Merkel au Spiegel<\/em>, avant sa visite \u00e0 Washington le 14 puis \u00e0 Moscou la semaine suivante, montrent plus une continuit\u00e9 de la politique Schr\u00f6der qu’un virage atlantiste, notamment avec le maintien d’un lien strat\u00e9gique avec Moscou. Ces d\u00e9clarations sont reproduites et comment\u00e9es par diverses sources, o\u00f9 le d\u00e9tail est parfois int\u00e9ressant. (Outre Radio Free Europe<\/a> cit\u00e9e par notre lecteur, on peut citer une pr\u00e9sentation de Reuters<\/a> ou un article de l’International Herld Tribune<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLe passage sur Guantanamo ne sera pas du tout appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 \u00e0 Washington, ou, plut\u00f4t, pr\u00e9cisons, il est d’ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 d\u00e9test\u00e9 \u00e0 Washington, ce passage. Schr\u00f6der n’en a jamais dit autant.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tSelon les rapports qui en sont faits, on distingue des nuances sympathiques ou les marques des inqui\u00e9tudes et angoisses des uns et des autres. Le groupe de questions int\u00e9ressantes qui se posent se r\u00e9sume dans le fait de savoir ce qu’a dit Merkel \u00e0 propos de Guantanamo, ce qu’elle a annonc\u00e9 qu’elle dira \u00e0 GW \u00e0 ce sujet, et finalement ce qu’elle dira pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment \u00e0 GW, lors de leur rencontre \u00e0 Washington. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t• Selon Karin Strohecker, de Reuters, \u00ab German Chancellor Angela Merkel, in an interview published days before her first visit to the United States, said Washington should close its Guantanamo Bay prison camp and find other ways of dealing with terror suspects. An institution like Guantanamo can and should not exist in the longer term, Merkel said in an interview with the weekly magazine Der Spiegel published on Saturday. Different ways and means must be found for dealing with these prisoners.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t• Selon AP\/AFP rem\u00e2ch\u00e9 par l’ l’International Herald Tribune<\/em>, \u00ab Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany said over the weekend that detention centers like the one at Guant\u00e1namo Bay should not be allowed to exist indefinitely but that she would not demand its closure during coming talks in Washington. Speaking to reporters at a meeting Saturday with leaders of her conservative Christian Democratic Party, Merkel reiterated a statement she had made in an interview that is to be published Monday in Der Spiegel, the German weekly magazine. An institution like Guant\u00e1namo cannot and should not be allowed to exist indefinitely, she said. In the interview, Merkel said, Different means of behaving with the prisoners have to be found. <\/em>[…] She said that her comments reflected only her opinion. While Merkel said she would not insist that the U.S. detention center at Guant\u00e1namo be closed when she meets on Thursday with President George W. Bush, she told Der Spiegel that she would raise the issue with him.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLorsqu’on dit \u00ab Washington should close<\/em> \u00bb, cela veut-il dire qu’on souhaite que Washington ferme cette prison? Ou bien est-ce que, malgr\u00e9 que cette prison \u00ab should not be allowed to exist indefinitely<\/em> \u00bb, Merkel \u00ab would not demand its closure during coming talks in Washington<\/em> \u00bb? Suspense Ses alli\u00e9s SPD ont f\u00e9licit\u00e9 Merkel et ont affirm\u00e9, eux, qu’il fallait fermer la prison de Guantanamo.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 9 janvier 2006 \u00e0 17H40<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Un de nos lecteurs (Louis Kuehn, Forum du 8 janvier) le note effectivement (\u00ab Merkel: le rapport avec Moscou est un partenariat strat\u00e9gique! \u00bb) Les d\u00e9clarations de Angela Merkel au Spiegel, avant sa visite \u00e0 Washington le 14 puis \u00e0 Moscou la semaine suivante, montrent plus une continuit\u00e9 de la politique Schr\u00f6der qu’un virage atlantiste,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[868,3243,4633],"class_list":["post-67165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bush","tag-guantanamo","tag-merkel"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67165\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}