La couverture m\u00e9diatique de l’\u00e9tude<\/a> de Linda Bilmes (Kennedy School, Harvard University) et de Joseph E. Stiglitz (Columbia University) nous annon\u00e7ant que la guerre contre l’Irak co\u00fbtera autour de $2.000 milliards a \u00e9t\u00e9 assez r\u00e9duite. Cela indique l’embarras de nombre de m\u00e9dias de devoir mettre en \u00e9vidence la pharamineuse comptabilit\u00e9 de la folie du roi George, ou bien, peut-\u00eatre, plus simplement, cela montre leur indiff\u00e9rence pour les informations qui ne sont pas de sources officielles ou qui n’ont pas l’approbation officielle. Par contre, les compte-rendus parus, s’ils sont peu nombreux, sont assez favorables. Le Christian Science Monitor<\/a> nous en donne une appr\u00e9ciation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tOn peut peut-\u00eatre consid\u00e9rer comme surprenant, mais qu’est-ce qui m\u00e9rite une surprise aujourd’hui? que la r\u00e9action du Financial Times<\/em> (en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral assez hostile \u00e0 ce qui d\u00e9valorise les autorit\u00e9s am\u00e9ricaines) soit effectivement favorable. Ce journal f\u00e9rocement et id\u00e9ologiquement lib\u00e9ral a parfois des r\u00e9actions inattendus, comme si une bouff\u00e9e de bon sens le prenait par surprise. Dans tous les cas, l’article de Martin Wolf<\/a> est tr\u00e8s radical dans son \u00e9valuation tr\u00e8s pessimiste des co\u00fbts de la guerre contre l’Irak. Il nous recommande bien s\u00fbr de ne pas m\u00e9priser les d\u00e9comptes de l’\u00e9conomiste Stiglitz (oppose \u00e0 la guerre, ce qui rendrait ses comptes suspects \u00e0 bien des experts). Il va m\u00eame jusqu’\u00e0 expliquer que cette \u00e9valuation lui para\u00eet en-de\u00e7a de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, parce qu’elle ne tient pas compte de certains domaines de co\u00fbts importants Le moins qu’on puisse dire est que Wolfe ne laisse rien passer et montre ainsi son pessimisme devant les conditions de cette guerre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab Among these are: costs borne by other countries, including those created by higher oil prices; costs consequent upon creating a link between Iraq and the jihadi movement that did not, on the evidence, previously exist; costs of increasing the income of some of the world’s least desirable regimes, above all, Iran’s; costs of throwing away the option to fight ground wars elsewhere or to fight in Iraq later on, under better conditions, better information and a better state of preparedness; costs of enraging many Muslims; costs to the effectiveness of the US military; costs of fragmenting the western alliance; the loss of Iraqi lives; the cost to US credibility of going to war on a false premise; and the cost to the US reputation of the torture scandals.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 11 janvier 2006 \u00e0 18H08<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" La couverture m\u00e9diatique de l’\u00e9tude de Linda Bilmes (Kennedy School, Harvard University) et de Joseph E. Stiglitz (Columbia University) nous annon\u00e7ant que la guerre contre l’Irak co\u00fbtera autour de $2.000 milliards a \u00e9t\u00e9 assez r\u00e9duite. Cela indique l’embarras de nombre de m\u00e9dias de devoir mettre en \u00e9vidence la pharamineuse comptabilit\u00e9 de la folie du roi… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3767,2631,2851,2645,857,2622,4975,2852,4976],"class_list":["post-67169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cout","tag-de","tag-financial","tag-guerre","tag-irak","tag-la","tag-stiglitz","tag-times","tag-wolfe"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67169\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}