{"id":67185,"date":"2006-01-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/17\/le-pentagone-et-le-deficit\/"},"modified":"2006-01-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-01-17T00:00:00","slug":"le-pentagone-et-le-deficit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/17\/le-pentagone-et-le-deficit\/","title":{"rendered":"Le Pentagone et le d\u00e9ficit"},"content":{"rendered":"

Quelques extraits d’un article en forme d’avertissement \u00e0 ses mandants de Lawrence P. Farrell Jr, pr\u00e9sident de la National Defense Industrial Association, dans le num\u00e9ro de janvier de National Defense Magazine<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Without fundamental reforms, the nation is headed for economic collapse, cautioned David Walker, the U.S. comptroller general. We could be doing nothing more than paying interest on federal debt in 2040, he told lawmakers.<\/em> (…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb As to what this means specifically for the Defense Department, the answer is that a funding derailment will occur sooner than later. The much talked-about October memo from acting Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England called for $32 billion in spending cuts ($7.5 billion in 2007) during the next six years. But if we are to believe the dire predictions from Walker and Greenspan, it is clear that even a $32 billion cut hardly will make a dent.<\/em> \u00bb <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Consequently, there could be more blood letting down the pike. Some defense industry experts have estimated the Defense Department could see a reduction of as much as $13 billion to $15 billion in 2007, alone. However, as long as we are engaged in Iraq, our troops will get the best our government and industry can provide. So while reductions might be on the horizon, the administration and Congress will be very careful with any reductions and how they are taken.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCes remarques de Lawrence P. Farrell Jr sont suivis du constat que l’Irak aura la priorit\u00e9 des priorit\u00e9s dans les ann\u00e9es \u00e0 venir, et de cet autre constat qu’\u00e0 part cette priorit\u00e9 le gouvernement n’a rien pr\u00e9vu de structurel dans les r\u00e9ductions in\u00e9vitables.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tC’est une des premi\u00e8res fois qu’apparaissent les chiffres de $13-$15 milliards de r\u00e9duction pour le budget DoD de 2007. Cette tendance qui doit \u00e9videmment s’accentuer pourrait conduire \u00e0 des r\u00e9ductions autour de $20 milliards en 2008, ce qui conduirait \u00e0 un budget largement inf\u00e9rieur, en pouvoir d’achat d’\u00e9quipements (compte tenu des priorit\u00e9s irakiennes), aux budgets les plus bas de l’\u00e9poque Clinton. La crise du Pentagone va s’aggraver dans le sens d’un d\u00e9sordre de plus en plus grand et d’une offensive constante de relations publiques pour masquer la r\u00e9alit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tPubli\u00e9 le 17 janvier 2006 \u00e0 15H19<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Quelques extraits d’un article en forme d’avertissement \u00e0 ses mandants de Lawrence P. Farrell Jr, pr\u00e9sident de la National Defense Industrial Association, dans le num\u00e9ro de janvier de National Defense Magazine : \u00ab Without fundamental reforms, the nation is headed for economic collapse, cautioned David Walker, the U.S. comptroller general. We could be doing nothing… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3228,4984,4985,3194],"class_list":["post-67185","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-crise","tag-farrell","tag-ndia","tag-pentagone"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67185","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67185"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67185\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}