{"id":67188,"date":"2006-01-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/18\/le-meilleur-ami-britannique-de-gw-porte-plainte-contre-la-nsa\/"},"modified":"2006-01-18T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-01-18T00:00:00","slug":"le-meilleur-ami-britannique-de-gw-porte-plainte-contre-la-nsa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/18\/le-meilleur-ami-britannique-de-gw-porte-plainte-contre-la-nsa\/","title":{"rendered":"Le meilleur ami britannique de GW porte plainte contre la NSA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Situation cocasse : parmi les innombrables personnes mises sur \u00e9coute dans le cadre du programme l\u00e9gal\/ill\u00e9gal (rayez la mention inutile) d&rsquo;\u00e9coute \u00e9lectronique de la NSA ordonn\u00e9 par GW Bush se trouve l&rsquo;auteur et journaliste britannique Christopher Hitchens ; et Hitchens est signataire de l&rsquo;une des deux plaintes contre la NSA qui viennent d&rsquo;\u00eatre officiellement d\u00e9pos\u00e9es. (Pourquoi avoir \u00e9cout\u00e9\/\u00e9couter (rayez la mention inutile) Hitchens? Parce que la bureaucratie, dont la NSA est une partie pesante, ne fait pas de d\u00e9tails. Puisque Hitchens est t\u00e9l\u00e9phoniquement et \u00e9lectroniquement actif avec divers correspondants aux USA et au Moyen-Orient impliqu\u00e9s dans les questions autour de la crise irakienne et le terrorisme, il est mis sur \u00e9coute.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tC&rsquo;est hier que l&rsquo;ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) de Detroit et le CCR (Center for Civil Rights) de New York ont port\u00e9 plainte contre la NSA pour violation de la Constitution (\u00e9coutes \u00e9lectroniques de personnes priv\u00e9es sans autorisation l\u00e9gale). Il s&rsquo;agit de la premi\u00e8re contre-offensive l\u00e9gale apr\u00e8s la mise \u00e0 jour de l&rsquo;op\u00e9ration d&rsquo;\u00e9coutes \u00e9lectroniques entreprise depuis plusieurs ann\u00e9es (depuis <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2324\" class=\"gen\">le d\u00e9but 2001<\/a> selon certaines sources).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/usa\/story\/0,12271,1688842,00.html\" class=\"gen\">Guardian<\/a> de ce jour \u00e9crit : \u00ab <em>In the ACLU suit, Hitchens joins other writers, Greenpeace and the Council on American-Islamic Relations in seeking an immediate end to the wiretaps, saying they violate constitutional rights to privacy and free speech.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The suit brought by Hitchens, Tara McKelvey, a senior editor at American Prospect magazine, James Bamford, author of two books on the NSA, and Barnett Rubin, an academic at New York University, addresses one of the primary fears surrounding the extrajudicial surveillance of telephone calls and email  that the NSA used the eavesdropping programme to spy on opponents of the Bush administration. Hitchens and the other plaintiffs said they feared their email and telephone calls were monitored, compromising their contacts in the Middle East. People will say it&rsquo;s wartime and we have a deadly enemy, and I agree with that. I was in favour of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan very strongly, but it is even more important in such a time that we don&rsquo;t give away power to the unaccountable agencies that helped get us into this in the first place, Hitchens told the Guardian. It is extremely important we know what the rules are and there has to be a line drawn. You mustn&rsquo;t turn emergency or panic measures into custom or practice.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 18 janvier 2006 \u00e0 17H29<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Situation cocasse : parmi les innombrables personnes mises sur \u00e9coute dans le cadre du programme l\u00e9gal\/ill\u00e9gal (rayez la mention inutile) d&rsquo;\u00e9coute \u00e9lectronique de la NSA ordonn\u00e9 par GW Bush se trouve l&rsquo;auteur et journaliste britannique Christopher Hitchens ; et Hitchens est signataire de l&rsquo;une des deux plaintes contre la NSA qui viennent d&rsquo;\u00eatre officiellement d\u00e9pos\u00e9es.&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4915,4990,4916,3871],"class_list":["post-67188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-ecoutes","tag-hitchens","tag-illegales","tag-nsa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67188"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67188\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}