{"id":67195,"date":"2006-01-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-20T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/20\/wheeler-defense-news-et-les-6698-milliards\/"},"modified":"2006-01-20T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-01-20T00:00:00","slug":"wheeler-defense-news-et-les-6698-milliards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/20\/wheeler-defense-news-et-les-6698-milliards\/","title":{"rendered":"Wheeler, Defense News<\/em> et les $669,8 milliards"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00c7a, c’est un petit \u00e9v\u00e9nement… Sit\u00f4t apr\u00e8s avoir mis en ligne (\u00e0 09H11)<\/a> l’\u00e9valuation du budget Dod de Winslow Wheeler, nous d\u00e9couvrons sur le site de Defense News<\/a> un article consacr\u00e9 \u00e0 cette \u00e9valuation (budget r\u00e9el du DoD : $669,8 milliards et non $453 milliards). Il faut dire que Wheeler publie \u00e9galement son analyse sur le site du Center of Defense Information<\/a>, o\u00f9 il est expert budg\u00e9taire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tUne int\u00e9ressante connexion est ainsi r\u00e9alis\u00e9e entre la publication dissidente\/marginale (CounterPunch<\/a>) et la publication mainstream<\/em> sp\u00e9cialis\u00e9e dans la d\u00e9fense que repr\u00e9sente Defense News<\/em>. (La m\u00eame remarque valant \u00e9galement pour le fait que Wheeler, du CDI, ait publi\u00e9 le m\u00eame jour sur CounterPunch.org<\/em>) La chose est assez rare pour \u00eatre signal\u00e9e avec force, cette connexion entre ces deux mondes parall\u00e8les de l’information \u00e9tant l’une des clefs d’une possible \u00e9volution des conditions politiques pr\u00e9sentes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAutre caract\u00e8re \u00e0 signaler, qui renforce notre remarque. Jusqu’ici, les connexions effectivement \u00e9tablies l’\u00e9taient sous la pression de l’\u00e9v\u00e9nement, par exemple quand le Web<\/em> publie des r\u00e9v\u00e9lations que la presse mainstream<\/em> ne peut ignorer \u00e0 cause de l’\u00e9cho public. Ici, d’une fa\u00e7on notablement diff\u00e9rente, il s’agit d’information sans r\u00e9el \u00e9cho spectaculaire imm\u00e9diat, mais qui redresse fortement la version virtualiste bien en cour. La connexion s’\u00e9tablit sur la valeur pure de l’information.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl s’agit d’un \u00e9v\u00e9nement novateur et int\u00e9ressant. Cela vaut citation suppl\u00e9mentaire sur l’\u00e9valuation Wheeler… \u00ab The United States will spend about $670 billion this year on defending and protecting American interests, a figure that is about $220 billion more than the narrowly defined defense spending, a longtime critic of defense budgets said.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb When the U.S. Congress passed the 2006 defense budget in December, the commonly advertised budget figure was $453 billion for the year ending Sept. 30, 2006. But that vastly understates the real amount being spent on national defense and international security, said Winslow Wheeler, defense budget analyst at the Center for Defense Information, a Washington think tank. <\/em>[…] But no one in Congress or the administration is interested in presenting the numbers like that, he said.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 10 janvier 2006 \u00e0 10H20<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00c7a, c’est un petit \u00e9v\u00e9nement… Sit\u00f4t apr\u00e8s avoir mis en ligne (\u00e0 09H11) l’\u00e9valuation du budget Dod de Winslow Wheeler, nous d\u00e9couvrons sur le site de Defense News un article consacr\u00e9 \u00e0 cette \u00e9valuation (budget r\u00e9el du DoD : $669,8 milliards et non $453 milliards). Il faut dire que Wheeler publie \u00e9galement son analyse sur… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3127,4996,3019,568,4003,4995],"class_list":["post-67195","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-budget","tag-cdi","tag-defense","tag-dod","tag-news","tag-wheeler"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67195","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67195"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67195\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}