{"id":67202,"date":"2006-01-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-22T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/22\/solana-possede-a-lot-a-lot-a-lot-a-lot-of-informations\/"},"modified":"2006-01-22T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-01-22T00:00:00","slug":"solana-possede-a-lot-a-lot-a-lot-a-lot-of-informations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/22\/solana-possede-a-lot-a-lot-a-lot-a-lot-of-informations\/","title":{"rendered":"Solana poss\u00e8de \u00ab a lot, a lot, a lot, a lot of informations…<\/em> \u00bb"},"content":{"rendered":"

Une autre question int\u00e9ressante lors de la conf\u00e9rence sur la pr\u00e9sentation du livre du g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Rupert Smith<\/a>. Elle concernait la crise iranienne, et le questionneur s’inqui\u00e9tait de savoir si ce n’\u00e9tait pas l\u00e0 un cas de risque de \u00ab industrial war<\/em> \u00bb dont le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral dit justement qu’elle est compl\u00e8tement d\u00e9pass\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tRupert Smith r\u00e9pond non sans habilet\u00e9 que, dans une telle crise, il faut montrer qu’on est pr\u00eat \u00e0 tout, justement pour ne pas avoir le faire (montrer sa force, ou en parler, pour ne pas avoir \u00e0 s’en servir). Solana, lui, dit au questionneur, en roulant des yeux sans doute terribles, qu’il ne peut pas discuter de ce sujet de l’Iran avec lui parce qu’il a \u00ab a lot, a lot, a lot, a lot of informations<\/em> \u00bb Il parle certes des informations classified<\/em> qui arrivent sur la situation de l’Iran, sur son programme nucl\u00e9aire, sur ses intentions belliqueuses, etc.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDiscutant apr\u00e8s, en priv\u00e9, de cette information, on observait effectivement que les dirigeants occidentaux en sont aujourd’hui, dans la crise iranienne qui vient de conna\u00eetre un rebondissement, au stade d’un flot ininterrompu d’informations venu de diff\u00e9rentes directions. Toutes tendent, selon l’habituel r\u00e9flexe bureaucratique, \u00e0 pousser dans le sens de l’alarmisme. Aucune ne fournit d’indications simples et fondamentales sur la situation de l’Iran. (Par exemple, quand Simon Jenkins<\/a> \u00e9crit le 11 janvier 2006: \u00abI would sleep happier if there were no Iranian bomb but a swamp of hypocrisy separates me from overly protesting it. Iran is a proud country that sits between nuclear Pakistan and India to its east, a nuclear Russia to its north and a nuclear Israel to its west. Adjacent Afghanistan and Iraq are occupied at will by a nuclear America, which backed Saddam Hussein in his 1980 invasion of Iran. How can we say such a country has no right to nuclear defence?<\/em> \u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tNe pas oublier que nous avions, avant d’attaquer l’Irak, \u00ab a lot, a lot, a lot, a lot of informations…<\/em> \u00bb sur Saddam, ses armes de destruction massive, son uranium, ses ors et ses pompes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 22 janvier 2006 \u00e0 18H09<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Une autre question int\u00e9ressante lors de la conf\u00e9rence sur la pr\u00e9sentation du livre du g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Rupert Smith. Elle concernait la crise iranienne, et le questionneur s’inqui\u00e9tait de savoir si ce n’\u00e9tait pas l\u00e0 un cas de risque de \u00ab industrial war \u00bb dont le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral dit justement qu’elle est compl\u00e8tement d\u00e9pass\u00e9e. Rupert Smith r\u00e9pond non… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2773,5003,4457,3777],"class_list":["post-67202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-iran","tag-rupert","tag-smith","tag-solana"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67202"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67202\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}