{"id":67214,"date":"2006-01-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-25T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/25\/le-fameux-breaking-point\/"},"modified":"2006-01-25T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-01-25T00:00:00","slug":"le-fameux-breaking-point","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/25\/le-fameux-breaking-point\/","title":{"rendered":"Le fameux \u201c<em>breaking point<\/em>\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>On parle depuis plus d&rsquo;une ann\u00e9e des tensions consid\u00e9rables que subit l&rsquo;U.S. Army \u00e0 cause de la guerre en Irak et de ses autres engagements. On parle notamment du <em>breaking point<\/em> auquel ces conditions pourraient conduire l&rsquo;Army. Pour la premi\u00e8re fois, un rapport semi-officiel y fait r\u00e9f\u00e9rence.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAssociated Press a re\u00e7u un exemplaire du rapport r\u00e9dig\u00e9 par <a href=\" http:\/\/sfgate.com\/cgi-bin\/article.cgi?file=\/n\/a\/2006\/01\/24\/national\/w133017S88.DTL\" class=\"gen\">Andrew Krepinevich<\/a>, ancien colonel de l&rsquo;U.S. Army devenu analyste ind\u00e9pendant. La rapport lui a \u00e9t\u00e9 command\u00e9 par le Pentagone. Krepinevic trace un bilan pessimiste de l&rsquo;\u00e9tat de l&rsquo;U.S. Army et, surtout, signale que la crainte de ce fameux <em>breaking point<\/em> commence \u00e0 jouer un r\u00f4le dans les d\u00e9cisions qui sont prises actuellement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Andrew Krepinevich, <\/em>[&#8230;] <em>concluded that the Army cannot sustain the pace of troop deployments to Iraq long enough to break the back of the insurgency. He also suggested that the Pentagon&rsquo;s decision, announced in December, to begin reducing the force in Iraq this year was driven in part by a realization that the Army was overextended.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>As evidence, Krepinevich points to the Army&rsquo;s 2005 recruiting slump  missing its recruiting goal for the first time since 1999  and its decision to offer much bigger enlistment bonuses and other incentives. You really begin to wonder just how much stress and strain there is on the Army, how much longer it can continue, he said in an interview.<\/em> (&#8230;)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>He wrote that the Army is in a race against time to adjust to the demands of war or risk breaking&rsquo; the force in the form of a catastrophic decline in recruitment and re-enlistment.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 25 janvier 2006 \u00e0 10H02<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On parle depuis plus d&rsquo;une ann\u00e9e des tensions consid\u00e9rables que subit l&rsquo;U.S. Army \u00e0 cause de la guerre en Irak et de ses autres engagements. On parle notamment du breaking point auquel ces conditions pourraient conduire l&rsquo;Army. Pour la premi\u00e8re fois, un rapport semi-officiel y fait r\u00e9f\u00e9rence. Associated Press a re\u00e7u un exemplaire du rapport&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3289,5026,4421,3521],"class_list":["post-67214","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-army","tag-breaking","tag-krepinevich","tag-point"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67214","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67214"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67214\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67214"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67214"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}