{"id":67219,"date":"2006-01-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-26T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/26\/et-cheney-rumsfeld-et-rice-devant-le-pe\/"},"modified":"2006-01-26T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-01-26T00:00:00","slug":"et-cheney-rumsfeld-et-rice-devant-le-pe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/26\/et-cheney-rumsfeld-et-rice-devant-le-pe\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2026 Et Cheney, Rumsfeld et Rice devant le PE?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Autre exemple (apr\u00e8s celui de Blair-Tyrie<\/a>) de la fa\u00e7on dont l’affaire de la CIA peut \u00e9voluer dans le sens d’un lent et ent\u00eat\u00e9 empoisonnement des relations USA-UK (et aussi comment elle peut mettre les gouvernements europ\u00e9ens dans un embarras qu’ils auront largement provoqu\u00e9) : cette intention de demander \u00e0 Cheney, Rumsfeld et Rice de venir t\u00e9moigner devant la Commission du Parlement europ\u00e9en form\u00e9e le 18 janvier<\/a> sur l’affaire de la CIA. Il n’y a aucune chance (estimation raisonnable) que cela aboutisse mais cela permettra quelques \u00e9pisodes acrimonieux o\u00f9 les gouvernements europ\u00e9ens devront, par devoir de vertu, d\u00e9fendre la demande des parlementaires. (A noter, signe que l’initiative possible est consid\u00e9r\u00e9e avec un certain s\u00e9rieux, que CBS.News<\/a> a aussit\u00f4t diffus\u00e9 la nouvelle.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tD’autre part, ces m\u00eames gouvernements europ\u00e9ens auront certains des leurs soumis \u00e0 la m\u00eame demande d’audition. Il leur sera plus difficile, toujours ce satan\u00e9 devoir de vertu, d’envoyer pa\u00eetre le PE et sa commission.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl y a, du c\u00f4t\u00e9 des milieux parlementaires europ\u00e9ens divers, une \u00e9mulation qu’on jugera saine pour le cas. Le PE ne veut pas laisser au seul Marty et au Conseil de l’Europe la gloire m\u00e9diatique d’enqu\u00eater sur la terrible CIA. Par cons\u00e9quent, il embraye et nous allons avoir de la surench\u00e8re de ce c\u00f4t\u00e9. Ci-dessous, quelques pr\u00e9cisions (selon AP, par Aljazeera.net<\/a>), en notant, ironie extr\u00eame par rapport aux engagements de son pays, le z\u00e8le d’une parlementaire britannique : \u00ab Very senior people would be asked to answer the allegations of human rights violations on EU territory, said Sarah Ludford, vice president of an investigation into the alleged prisons being conducted by the European Parliament, on Thursday. I don’t see why we should not invite Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, Ludford said. I’m sure they would be very welcome and they would be heard with great interest, or (US Secretary of State) Condoleezza Rice perhaps, why not?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb But Ludford, a British Liberal Democrat party member, acknowledged that the parliament had no legal power to subpoena them. I would not be over optimistic but I don’t think it’s completely off the planet to think that they might come to see us, she said.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb The parliament committee held its first meeting on Thursday, electing Portuguese Conservative Carlos Coelho as its president and three vice-chairs, including Ludford. I hope that we will be inviting very senior people from governments, from non-governmental organisations and people who have knowledge of the intelligence community, said Ludfurd. If they are seen not to cooperate then I think we can draw conclusions.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 26 janvier 2006 \u00e0 17H04<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Autre exemple (apr\u00e8s celui de Blair-Tyrie) de la fa\u00e7on dont l’affaire de la CIA peut \u00e9voluer dans le sens d’un lent et ent\u00eat\u00e9 empoisonnement des relations USA-UK (et aussi comment elle peut mettre les gouvernements europ\u00e9ens dans un embarras qu’ils auront largement provoqu\u00e9) : cette intention de demander \u00e0 Cheney, Rumsfeld et Rice de venir… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1294,3104,1463,5032,3306,569],"class_list":["post-67219","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cheney","tag-cia","tag-commission","tag-pe","tag-rice","tag-rumsfeld"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67219","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67219"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67219\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67219"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67219"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67219"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}