{"id":67231,"date":"2006-01-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-31T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/31\/un-vote-dimpeachment-contre-tony-blair-en-mars\/"},"modified":"2006-01-31T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-01-31T00:00:00","slug":"un-vote-dimpeachment-contre-tony-blair-en-mars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/31\/un-vote-dimpeachment-contre-tony-blair-en-mars\/","title":{"rendered":"Un vote d’impeachment<\/em> contre Tony Blair en mars?"},"content":{"rendered":"

La particularit\u00e9 de cette \u00e9poque est que toutes les complications affectant les autorit\u00e9s engag\u00e9es dans les montages virtualistes (essentiellement les deux gouvernements anglo-saxons US et UK), alors qu’elles sont ridiculis\u00e9es sit\u00f4t qu’elles apparaissent, montrent une extraordinaire capacit\u00e9 de r\u00e9sistance. R\u00e9guli\u00e8rement, des dossiers oubli\u00e9s ou jug\u00e9s sans espoir d’aboutir, reparaissent dans l’actualit\u00e9, brusquement renforc\u00e9s. L’exemple du jour est la proc\u00e9dure \u00e9ventuelle de mis en accusation de Tony Blair. L’intervention de Sir Michael Rose<\/a> l’avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 r\u00e9cemment remise au go\u00fbt du jour.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tThe Independent<\/a> du 31 janvier annonce qu’un effort tr\u00e8s s\u00e9rieux est lanc\u00e9 aux Communes par un groupe comptant pas moins de 122 d\u00e9put\u00e9s des trois partis, pour obtenir que les partis m\u00e9nagent un temps libre en mars, pour le troisi\u00e8me anniversaire du d\u00e9clenchement de la guerre, pour un d\u00e9bat sur la question. Il s’agit d’examiner les conditions de l’entr\u00e9e en guerre, du point de vue britannique, pour d\u00e9terminer s’il n’y a pas eu tromperie de la part du Premier ministre au point de justifier un vote demandant sa destitution.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Leaders of a cross-party group calling for Mr Blair to be impeached will meet tonight at Westminster to discuss their tactics. They believe they will be able to persuade either the Liberal Democrats or the Conservatives to allocate time for a debate and a vote in the Commons in mid-March, to coincide with the third anniversary of the Commons vote that endorsed military action in Iraq. Among the 122 MPs who have signed the motion are the former international development secretary Clare Short, who resigned from the Cabinet over the war; Peter Kilfoyle, the former defence minister; and the former Conservative minister Douglas Hogg. Adam Price, the Plaid Cymru MP, said 22 Labour MPs and more than 50 Liberal Democrats had signed the motion.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb There is a constitutional issue over how we balance the power of the Prime Minister and a small group of people around him, with Parliament. It predates Blair but now is the time for Parliament to stand up and be counted and say we need a full inquiry. We have to learn the lessons from this wrong-headed invasion. We have to stop this happening again, whether it is Iran or Syria or somewhere else. He said the calls by General Sir Michael Rose, the British UN commander in Bosnia, for Mr Blair to be impeached had strengthened the campaign for a inquiry.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 31 janvier 2006 \u00e0 13H33<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La particularit\u00e9 de cette \u00e9poque est que toutes les complications affectant les autorit\u00e9s engag\u00e9es dans les montages virtualistes (essentiellement les deux gouvernements anglo-saxons US et UK), alors qu’elles sont ridiculis\u00e9es sit\u00f4t qu’elles apparaissent, montrent une extraordinaire capacit\u00e9 de r\u00e9sistance. R\u00e9guli\u00e8rement, des dossiers oubli\u00e9s ou jug\u00e9s sans espoir d’aboutir, reparaissent dans l’actualit\u00e9, brusquement renforc\u00e9s. L’exemple du… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[705,5046,4720],"class_list":["post-67231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-blair","tag-impeachment","tag-rose"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67231"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67231\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}