{"id":67232,"date":"2006-01-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-01-31T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/31\/le-destin-du-cas-iranien-au-conseil-de-securite\/"},"modified":"2006-01-31T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-01-31T00:00:00","slug":"le-destin-du-cas-iranien-au-conseil-de-securite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/01\/31\/le-destin-du-cas-iranien-au-conseil-de-securite\/","title":{"rendered":"Le destin du cas iranien au Conseil de S\u00e9curit\u00e9"},"content":{"rendered":"

Le dossier iranien va aller devant le Conseil de S\u00e9curit\u00e9. Pourquoi faire ? La Maison-Blanche se frotte les mains, imaginant qu’il s’agit d’une tr\u00e8s grande victoire. Tous les \u00e9v\u00e9nements, aujourd’hui, ont leurs revers : le transfert du dossier iranien au Conseil de S\u00e9curit\u00e9, \u00e0 l’insistance grossi\u00e8re des am\u00e9ricains, signifie au moins une chose : les Am\u00e9ricains s’engagent dans le processus onusien dans leur croisade contre l’Iran. Par cons\u00e9quent, il leur sera difficile de se passer de l’aval du Conseil pour quelque initiative que ce soit (on pense \u00e9videmment \u00e0 une attaque).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOr, il existe des indications pr\u00e9cises selon lesquelles un des cinq membres du Conseil, qui a sign\u00e9 r\u00e9cemment un important accord avec l’Iran, a accept\u00e9 l’ajout d’une clause secr\u00e8te \u00e0 la demande des iraniens. Cette clause stipule que le signataire s’opposera devant le Conseil de S\u00e9curit\u00e9, o\u00f9 il a un droit de veto, \u00e0 toute initiative agressive contre l’Iran.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 31 janvier 2006 \u00e0 13H34<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le dossier iranien va aller devant le Conseil de S\u00e9curit\u00e9. Pourquoi faire ? La Maison-Blanche se frotte les mains, imaginant qu’il s’agit d’une tr\u00e8s grande victoire. Tous les \u00e9v\u00e9nements, aujourd’hui, ont leurs revers : le transfert du dossier iranien au Conseil de S\u00e9curit\u00e9, \u00e0 l’insistance grossi\u00e8re des am\u00e9ricains, signifie au moins une chose : les… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3977,5047,2773,3478,2629],"class_list":["post-67232","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-chine","tag-clause","tag-iran","tag-onu","tag-secrete"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67232","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67232"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67232\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67232"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67232"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67232"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}