{"id":67239,"date":"2006-02-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-02-02T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/02\/02\/le-discours-quil-fallait-ecouter-entre-les-lignes-plutot-quau-pied-de-la-lettre\/"},"modified":"2006-02-02T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-02-02T00:00:00","slug":"le-discours-quil-fallait-ecouter-entre-les-lignes-plutot-quau-pied-de-la-lettre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/02\/02\/le-discours-quil-fallait-ecouter-entre-les-lignes-plutot-quau-pied-de-la-lettre\/","title":{"rendered":"Le discours qu’il fallait \u00e9couter entre les lignes plut\u00f4t qu’au pied de la lettre"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ceci, c’est une premi\u00e8re. Si le discours sur l’\u00e9tat de l’Union de GW n’avait gu\u00e8re d’int\u00e9r\u00eat<\/a>, il en avait encore trop. L’une des affirmations de GW, qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 reprise par certains commentateurs comme l’\u00e9l\u00e9ment central du discours, et qui l’a \u00e9t\u00e9 d’autant plus qu’elle constituait une proposition tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9cise (r\u00e9duction de la d\u00e9pendance du p\u00e9trole du Moyen-Orient de 75% d’ici 2025), ne signifiait pas exactement, non, plut\u00f4t pas du tout, ce qu’elle semblait signifier litt\u00e9ralement et \u00e0 premi\u00e8re vue, c’est-\u00e0-dire en suivant ligne par ligne. (Autre hypoth\u00e8se, plus s\u00e9rieuse tout de m\u00eame : il semblerait que l’\u00e9quipe GW-Cheney a \u00e9t\u00e9 l’objet de remarques acerbes quoique discr\u00e8tes de leurs amis de l’industrie p\u00e9troli\u00e8re. En toute amiti\u00e9.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe r\u00e9cit, sur le site Knight Ridder<\/a>, de l’explication de texte un rien censur\u00e9e du discours sur l’\u00e9tat de l’Union, est tr\u00e8s divertissante. Les d\u00e9tails sur les raisons de certains aspects de l’exemple donn\u00e9 qui n’\u00e9tait finalement qu’une image, et encore une image d’\u00c9pinal, sont tr\u00e8s int\u00e9ressants par ce qu’ils nous disent de l’estime o\u00f9 l’on tient les capacit\u00e9s de compr\u00e9hension des Am\u00e9ricains. Voici ces explications: \u00ab One day after President Bush vowed to reduce America’s dependence on Middle East oil by cutting imports from there 75 percent by 2025, his energy secretary and national economic adviser said Wednesday that the president didn’t mean it literally. What the president meant, they said in a conference call with reporters, was that alternative fuels could displace an amount of oil imports equivalent to most of what America is expected to import from the Middle East in 2025. But America still would import oil from the Middle East, because that’s where the greatest oil supplies are.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb The president’s State of the Union reference to Mideast oil made headlines nationwide Wednesday because of his assertion that America is addicted to oil and his call to break this addiction. Bush vowed to fund research into better batteries for hybrid vehicles and more production of the alternative fuel ethanol, setting a lofty goal of replacing more than 75 percent of our oil imports from the Middle East by 2025. He pledged to move beyond a petroleum-based economy and make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past. Not exactly, though, it turns out.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb This was purely an example, Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman said. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tHe said the broad goal was to displace foreign oil imports, from anywhere, with domestic alternatives. He acknowledged that oil is a freely traded commodity bought and sold globally by private firms. Consequently, it would be very difficult to reduce imports from any single region, especially the most oil-rich region on Earth.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Asked why the president used the words the Middle East when he didn’t really mean them, one administration official said Bush wanted to dramatize the issue in a way that every American sitting out there listening to the speech understands. The official spoke only on condition of anonymity because he feared that his remarks might get him in trouble.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 2 f\u00e9vrier \u00e0 14H31<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ceci, c’est une premi\u00e8re. Si le discours sur l’\u00e9tat de l’Union de GW n’avait gu\u00e8re d’int\u00e9r\u00eat, il en avait encore trop. L’une des affirmations de GW, qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 reprise par certains commentateurs comme l’\u00e9l\u00e9ment central du discours, et qui l’a \u00e9t\u00e9 d’autant plus qu’elle constituait une proposition tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9cise (r\u00e9duction de la d\u00e9pendance du… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[868,2826,2631,3756,4419,3600],"class_list":["post-67239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bush","tag-censure","tag-de","tag-etat","tag-lunion","tag-petrole"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67239","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67239"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67239\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}