\u00e9checs r\u00e9cents<\/a> dans ce domaine. La l\u00e9gislation ITAR, qui constitue un fantastique imbroglio bureaucratique, porte sur des mati\u00e8res parfois compl\u00e8tement ridicules, au regard de la logique de protection des capacit\u00e9s technologiques de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale sur laquelle elle se fonde. La l\u00e9gislation ITAR est un des cas exemplaires de dictature de la bureaucratie, si l’on mesure les extraordinaires difficult\u00e9s, et finalement les \u00e9checs jusqu’ici des pouvoirs<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLes industriels am\u00e9ricains eux-m\u00eames sont oppos\u00e9s \u00e0 cette l\u00e9gislation, qui entrave consid\u00e9rablement leur coop\u00e9ration avec les non-US. Le 2 f\u00e9vrier, le CEO de Northrop Grumman, Ron Sugar, a parl\u00e9 de ce sujet au Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) de Londres. Sugar a qualifi\u00e9 la l\u00e9gislation ITAR de \u00ab product of the Cold War<\/em> \u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tCommentaire de Sugar: \u00ab The UK may ask why it does not have an exemption from ITAR along the lines of the Canadian exemption. And that is a reasonable question. If I was in your <\/em>[the UK’s] position that is a question I would be asking.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 5 f\u00e9vrier 2006 \u00e0 19H32<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
La l\u00e9gislation ITAR enrage les industriels et officiels non-US qui cherchent \u00e0 coop\u00e9rer avec les USA dans le domaine des armements. Les Britanniques sont particuli\u00e8rement furieux des \u00e9checs r\u00e9cents dans ce domaine. La l\u00e9gislation ITAR, qui constitue un fantastique imbroglio bureaucratique, porte sur des mati\u00e8res parfois compl\u00e8tement ridicules, au regard de la logique de protection… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2623,4793,5065,5064],"class_list":["post-67249","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bureaucratie","tag-itar","tag-northrop","tag-sugar"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67249","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67249"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67249\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67249"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67249"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67249"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}