{"id":67266,"date":"2006-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-02-10T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/02\/10\/le-budget-au-sommet-de-lempire\/"},"modified":"2006-02-10T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-02-10T00:00:00","slug":"le-budget-au-sommet-de-lempire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/02\/10\/le-budget-au-sommet-de-lempire\/","title":{"rendered":"Le budget au sommet de l’empire"},"content":{"rendered":"

Avec le budget du Pentagone 2006, on atteint les sommets des d\u00e9penses de d\u00e9fense de la Guerre froide. Nous entrons dans l’histoire des records, budg\u00e9taires mais aussi : fraudes et gaspillages.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’administration GW, jamais \u00e0 court d’arguments fallacieux, fait une comparaison en pourcentages du PNB. Le budget de 1963 de l’administration Kennedy atteignant 9% du PNB ($54 milliards), ceux des autres p\u00e9riodes de la Guerre froide oscillant entre 4% et 8%, celui de FY2006 de l’administration GW Bush ($439 milliards en d\u00e9penses et $453 milliards en engagements de d\u00e9penses) est quasiment un budget d’aust\u00e9rit\u00e9 : 3,9% du PNB.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tInterview\u00e9 par UPI<\/a>, Christopher Hellman, d\u00e9fense analyste du Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, rejette avec agacement et m\u00eame col\u00e8re l’argument du PNB comme totalement sp\u00e9cieux, et utilis\u00e9 sp\u00e9cieusement en connaissance de cause: \u00ab The GDP argument is the last refuge of scoundrels, \u00bb Hellman told UPI Wednesday. Comparing (the defense budget) to GDP is a measure of the program’s burden on the U.S. economy. Spending levels are a (measure of a) program’s burden on the American taxpayer. It’s a fallacious argument, he said. Tying our level of spending to defense to the number of cheeseburgers consumed by Americans is not a good way to measure our strategic requirement.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Hellman offered the counter-argument: What if gross domestic product decreases? If you are going to decide what is an appropriate defense budget based GDP, what happens if the economy tanks? Are you going to cut it in half? he said. They only want to tie it to GDP when GDP is going up, not when it’s going down.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 10 f\u00e9vrier 2006 \u00e0 13H59<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Avec le budget du Pentagone 2006, on atteint les sommets des d\u00e9penses de d\u00e9fense de la Guerre froide. Nous entrons dans l’histoire des records, budg\u00e9taires mais aussi : fraudes et gaspillages. L’administration GW, jamais \u00e0 court d’arguments fallacieux, fait une comparaison en pourcentages du PNB. Le budget de 1963 de l’administration Kennedy atteignant 9% du… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3127,568,3106,2645,5082,5083],"class_list":["post-67266","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-budget","tag-dod","tag-froide","tag-guerre","tag-hellman","tag-pnb"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67266","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67266"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67266\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67266"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67266"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67266"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}