{"id":67286,"date":"2006-02-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-02-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/02\/19\/ladministration-gw-craint-elle-de-se-lancer-dans-une-attaque-contre-liran-pourquoi-le-craindrait-elle-donc\/"},"modified":"2006-02-19T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-02-19T00:00:00","slug":"ladministration-gw-craint-elle-de-se-lancer-dans-une-attaque-contre-liran-pourquoi-le-craindrait-elle-donc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/02\/19\/ladministration-gw-craint-elle-de-se-lancer-dans-une-attaque-contre-liran-pourquoi-le-craindrait-elle-donc\/","title":{"rendered":"L&rsquo;administration GW craint-elle de se lancer dans une attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran? Pourquoi le craindrait-elle donc?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>William Pfaff examine la question de l&rsquo;attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran, que Washington pourrait d\u00e9cider de lancer. Techniquement et militairement, voire strat\u00e9giquement, voire politiquement, on pourrait penser qu&rsquo;un tel projet est extr\u00eamement d\u00e9vastateur et tr\u00e8s risqu\u00e9 Et alors ?, interroge Pfaff,  justement!<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDans <a href=\"http:\/\/www.williampfaff.com\/modules\/news\/article.php?storyid=102\" class=\"gen\">son analyse<\/a> du 14 f\u00e9vrier, l&rsquo;historien-chroniqueur s&rsquo;appuie notablement sur la psychologie des dirigeants US et sur leurs principaux inspirateurs, pour montrer que ces perspectives, catastrophiques pour tout esprit raisonnable, le sont effectivement pour ces psychologies-l\u00e0, mais dans un sens particuli\u00e8rement attirant. C&rsquo;est traiter, fort justement, l&rsquo;actuel probl\u00e8me de la direction am\u00e9ricaniste du point de vue qui importe, qui est pathologie de la psychologie actuellement dominante.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>There is also a Marxist influence on administration thinking about enlarging its war with Islamic societies. This has been transmitted to the Bush government from the Trotskyism that influenced the ways of thinking of today&rsquo;s neo-conservative offspring of those men and women who fought the ideological struggles of the 1930s and 1940s.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Marxism (Trotskyism in particular), like neo-conservatism, is a doctrine of provisional catastrophe. There will be a political paradise on earth, but it will only come through wars and other catastrophic events. This is a characteristic of all totalitarian thought. What it means is that if an attack on Iran makes America&rsquo;s conflict with Islam worse, this is good, because it brings the final triumph closer.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Such is also the apocalyptic theological outlook of many of the fundamentalist Protestant supporters of the president (and conceivably of the president himself, since he describes himself as a born-again believer). Their conviction is that bad times and war actually are good times, since they are the prophesied and necessary preliminary to the End of Time and the Christian Messiah&rsquo;s return.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2006 \u00e0 12H44<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>William Pfaff examine la question de l&rsquo;attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran, que Washington pourrait d\u00e9cider de lancer. Techniquement et militairement, voire strat\u00e9giquement, voire politiquement, on pourrait penser qu&rsquo;un tel projet est extr\u00eamement d\u00e9vastateur et tr\u00e8s risqu\u00e9 Et alors ?, interroge Pfaff, justement! Dans son analyse du 14 f\u00e9vrier, l&rsquo;historien-chroniqueur s&rsquo;appuie notablement sur la psychologie des dirigeants US&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5103,2773,1104,1131,3099],"class_list":["post-67286","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-evangelistes","tag-iran","tag-neocons","tag-pfaff","tag-psychologie"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67286"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67286\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}