{"id":67292,"date":"2006-02-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-02-21T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/02\/21\/bizarre-bizarre-la-palestine-du-hamas-et-lirak-post-saddam-sur-le-meme-pied\/"},"modified":"2006-02-21T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-02-21T00:00:00","slug":"bizarre-bizarre-la-palestine-du-hamas-et-lirak-post-saddam-sur-le-meme-pied","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/02\/21\/bizarre-bizarre-la-palestine-du-hamas-et-lirak-post-saddam-sur-le-meme-pied\/","title":{"rendered":"Bizarre, bizarre\u2026 La Palestine du Hamas et l&rsquo;Irak post-Saddam sur le m\u00eame pied"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>C&rsquo;est une rencontre symbolique des \u00e9v\u00e9nements et une mesure du succ\u00e8s de la politique moyenne orientale des Am\u00e9ricains (des Anglo-Saxons). Hier, les Am\u00e9ricains, fid\u00e8lement soutenus par leurs amis anglais, ont <a href=\"http:\/\/news.independent.co.uk\/world\/americas\/article346735.ece\" class=\"gen\">menac\u00e9<\/a> de couper leur aide \u00e0 l&rsquo;Irak sui le gouvernement en formation comprend certains ministres trop marqu\u00e9s par l&rsquo;activisme chiite. Comme l&rsquo;on sait, ils viennent de prendre cette m\u00eame mesure contre l&rsquo;Autorit\u00e9 Palestinienne \u00e0 cause de la victoire du Hamas.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00c9trange rencontre : apr\u00e8s la conqu\u00eate de l&rsquo;Irak et l&rsquo;\u00e9limination de Saddam, l&rsquo;Irak devait devenir un protectorat US. Apr\u00e8s la mort d&rsquo;Arafat, les Palestiniens devaient ob\u00e9ir au doigt et \u00e0 l&rsquo;il. Ce qui doit nous arr\u00eater ici, plus que l&rsquo;interventionnisme am\u00e9ricaniste qui est vieux comme le monde (ou comme l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique) , c&rsquo;est qu&rsquo;il soit n\u00e9cessaire dans ces deux cas qui paraissaient \u00eatre du sur mesure d&rsquo;effectuer de telles pressions,  d&rsquo;ailleurs sans aucune garantie de succ\u00e8s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes Palestiniens et l&rsquo;Irak figurent tr\u00e8s haut dans les cons\u00e9quences des erreurs constamment et irr\u00e9m\u00e9diablement catastrophiques de la politique ext\u00e9rieure am\u00e9ricaniste.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa m\u00e9diocrit\u00e9 du personnel am\u00e9ricaniste, refl\u00e9tant cette d\u00e9cadence de la politique US, se refl\u00e8te dans les pi\u00e8tres arguments \u00e9voqu\u00e9s  notamment la lle\u00e7on de choses sur le sectarisme  pour menacer Bagdad, r\u00e9gime pr\u00e9tendument aux ordres, de la rupture de l&rsquo;aide.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>The US and Britain are pressuring Iraq&rsquo;s dominant Shia community to relinquish two key ministries in negotiations for a new government, as the country was hit by a wave of bombings that killed at least 24 people.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The US ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, warned yesterday that Washington might cut aid to the Iraqis if the new government included sectarian politicians, pointing out that the US had spent billions in building up the police and the army.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>American taxpayers expect their money to be spent properly. We are not going to invest the resources of the American people into forces run by people who are sectarian, he said. He singled out the defence and interior ministries, saying they should be in the hands of people who are non-sectarian, broadly acceptable and who are not tied to militias.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 21 f\u00e9vrier 2006 \u00e0 08H44<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>C&rsquo;est une rencontre symbolique des \u00e9v\u00e9nements et une mesure du succ\u00e8s de la politique moyenne orientale des Am\u00e9ricains (des Anglo-Saxons). Hier, les Am\u00e9ricains, fid\u00e8lement soutenus par leurs amis anglais, ont menac\u00e9 de couper leur aide \u00e0 l&rsquo;Irak sui le gouvernement en formation comprend certains ministres trop marqu\u00e9s par l&rsquo;activisme chiite. Comme l&rsquo;on sait, ils viennent&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5110,5111,857],"class_list":["post-67292","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-aide","tag-hamas","tag-irak"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67292","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67292"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67292\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67292"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67292"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67292"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}