{"id":67310,"date":"2006-02-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-02-27T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/02\/27\/replique-du-senateur-il-est-temps-detre-serieux\/"},"modified":"2006-02-27T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-02-27T00:00:00","slug":"replique-du-senateur-il-est-temps-detre-serieux","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/02\/27\/replique-du-senateur-il-est-temps-detre-serieux\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2026 R\u00e9plique du s\u00e9nateur : il est temps d&rsquo;\u00eatre s\u00e9rieux"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>L&rsquo;explication mirobolante de Stephen Hadley sur <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2456\" class=\"gen\">les avantages stabilisateurs<\/a> de la quasi-guerre civile en Irak ont un peu agac\u00e9 de-ci de-l\u00e0. C&rsquo;est notamment le cas du s\u00e9nateur Carl Levin, chef de la minorit\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate \u00e0 la commission des forces arm\u00e9es au S\u00e9nat. Ses r\u00e9flexions telles qu&rsquo;elles ont \u00e9t\u00e9 diffus\u00e9es <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/afp\/20060226\/pl_afp\/usiraqunrest&#038;printer=1;_ylt=Aq19XHE.qNhYzDNVOiyU_vutOrgF;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MXN1bHE0BHNlYwN0bWE-\" class=\"gen\">ce week-end<\/a> repr\u00e9sentent une sorte d&rsquo;ultimatum pour l&rsquo;administration GW Bush.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>However, a senior US lawmaker questioned Hadley&rsquo;s optimism, saying Washington should review withdrawing its thousands of troops from Iraq if the Iraqis fail to get their political house in order soon.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>If within the next six to eight weeks, you do not create a government of national unity, if you continue to squabble, if you continue to fiddle while Baghdad burns, then we are going to have to reassess our presence, Senator Carl Levin, the top Democrat on the powerful Senate Armed Services Committee, said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Asked, in an interview with ABC News television&rsquo;s This Week&rsquo; program, if this position represented a warning that the US military could be withdrawn from Iraq, Levin replied: Exactly.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl faut observer que cet ultimatum&rsquo; de Levin rejoint un avertissement du s\u00e9nateur Warner (pr\u00e9sident de la m\u00eame commission, \u00e0 la t\u00eate de la majorit\u00e9 r\u00e9publicaine) donn\u00e9 en d\u00e9cembre 2005. Selon Warner, c&rsquo;\u00e9tait dans les 90 jours, au bout du processus apr\u00e8s les \u00e9lections de la mi-d\u00e9cembre, qu&rsquo;on verrait s&rsquo;il \u00e9tait possible pour les USA de continuer la politique actuelle en Irak. Si ce n&rsquo;\u00e9tait pas le cas, si les \u00e9v\u00e9nements allaient de mal en pis, il faudrait consid\u00e9rer un retrait.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 27 f\u00e9vrier 2006 \u00e0 13H37<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>L&rsquo;explication mirobolante de Stephen Hadley sur les avantages stabilisateurs de la quasi-guerre civile en Irak ont un peu agac\u00e9 de-ci de-l\u00e0. C&rsquo;est notamment le cas du s\u00e9nateur Carl Levin, chef de la minorit\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate \u00e0 la commission des forces arm\u00e9es au S\u00e9nat. Ses r\u00e9flexions telles qu&rsquo;elles ont \u00e9t\u00e9 diffus\u00e9es ce week-end repr\u00e9sentent une sorte d&rsquo;ultimatum&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5137,857,4780,4849,3470],"class_list":["post-67310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-hadley","tag-irak","tag-levin","tag-retrait","tag-warner"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67310"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67310\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}