Depuis trois ans, l’ancien vice-pr\u00e9sident Al Gore (battu par GW Bush aux pr\u00e9sidentielles de 2000) s’est signal\u00e9 par des interventions solennelles et souvent jug\u00e9es remarquables, contre l’\u00e9volution de l’actuelle administration. Gore a pris le parti d’attaquer l’administration GW du point de vue des principes fondamentaux de la Grande R\u00e9publique. Il a de quoi faire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tA cela a correspondu un d\u00e9sarroi grandissant dans le parti d\u00e9mocrate, enferm\u00e9 dans un soutien forc\u00e9 \u00e0 la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale de GW, tout en d\u00e9non\u00e7ant l’administration sur certains aspects de son action. L’\u00e9chec de Kerry en novembre 2004 a illustr\u00e9 ce d\u00e9sarroi. Le parti d\u00e9mocrate va-t-il \u00e9voluer ? La question reste ouverte.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tPour l’heure et pour Al Gore, des rumeurs persistantes, qui prennent en compte l’impuissance des d\u00e9mocrates, parlent d’un retour possible de l’ancien vice-pr\u00e9sident. Dans quel contexte ? Comme candidat du parti anti-guerre (terme encore bien vague) en 2008, bien s\u00fbr. C’est ce que signale le Sunday Telegraph<\/em> de ce jour<\/a> : \u00ab If few senior Democrats are calling publicly for Bush to be placed in the dock, plenty are flirting with the idea. One of them is Al Gore, the defeated 2000 presidential candidate, who is increasingly talked up as a serious anti-war contender at the next election.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb Gore said recently that Bush’s unlawful eavesdropping was part of a larger pattern of seeming indifference to the American constitution, which could well be an impeachable offence.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 19 mars 2006 \u00e0 17H33<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Depuis trois ans, l’ancien vice-pr\u00e9sident Al Gore (battu par GW Bush aux pr\u00e9sidentielles de 2000) s’est signal\u00e9 par des interventions solennelles et souvent jug\u00e9es remarquables, contre l’\u00e9volution de l’actuelle administration. Gore a pris le parti d’attaquer l’administration GW du point de vue des principes fondamentaux de la Grande R\u00e9publique. Il a de quoi faire. A… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4906,3554,3342],"class_list":["post-67365","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-4906","tag-anti-guerre","tag-gore"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67365","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67365"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67365\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67365"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67365"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67365"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}