{"id":67372,"date":"2006-03-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-03-21T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/03\/21\/violence-de-la-critique-aux-usa\/"},"modified":"2006-03-21T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-03-21T00:00:00","slug":"violence-de-la-critique-aux-usa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/03\/21\/violence-de-la-critique-aux-usa\/","title":{"rendered":"Violence de la critique aux USA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Avec le troisi\u00e8me anniversaire de la guerre contre l&rsquo;Irak, la critique de l&rsquo;administration Bush atteint de nouveaux sommets de violence, en m\u00eame temps qu&rsquo;une exasp\u00e9ration extr\u00eame. Cela est perceptible essentiellement dans l&rsquo;information alternative, sur le r\u00e9seau, o\u00f9 se trouve le seul espace de libert\u00e9 de critique (aux USA mais aussi dans nombre de nos pays europ\u00e9ens) et qui est ainsi devenue une branche \u00e0 part enti\u00e8re de l&rsquo;information au sens le plus large,  et, bien entendu, la plus honorable selon notre point de vue.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe texte qui nous inspire cette r\u00e9flexion est celui de Paul Craig Roberts, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/roberts\/?articleid=8737\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a> sur <em>Antiwar.com<\/em>. Paul Craig Roberts est un commentateur au <em>curriculum vitae<\/em> honorable du point de vue du syst\u00e8me puisqu&rsquo;il fut n\u00b02 du minist\u00e8re des Finances (Assistant Secretary of Tresor) et \u00e9ditorialiste au Wall Street <em>Journal<\/em>. La violence de son propos en est d&rsquo;autant plus significative.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUn extrait, justement significatif : \u00ab <em>Americans need to understand that terrorists are responding to America&rsquo;s behavior, or misbehavior. The only successful way to stop terrorism is to alter our behavior. America is not God. It has no right, and it certainly lacks the power, to impose its will on the world.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The Bush regime cannot lead the world to democracy by tearing democracy down at home. Not since Abraham Lincoln have American civil liberties been so threatened as by the Bush regime. America even has an attorney general, a vice president, and a secretary of defense who believe in torture. How do they differ from officials in the Third Reich or Stalin&rsquo;s KGB? Anyone who believes in torture is not an American. That person is outside our tradition. Yet people who believe in torture who occupy our highest offices.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tNous sommes dans le cas de la violence et de l&rsquo;exasp\u00e9ration lorsque des personnalit\u00e9s de l&rsquo;administration sont jug\u00e9es \u00e9quivalentes \u00e0 des Nazis et \u00e0 des hommes du KGB, et jug\u00e9es \u00e9galement comme non-am\u00e9ricaines. Cette violence et cette exasp\u00e9ration vont se poursuivre et s&rsquo;amplifier parce qu&rsquo;elles trouvent chaque jour, dans le comportement de la direction US, \u00e0 la fois justification et incitation \u00e0 s&rsquo;affirmer davantage. (C&rsquo;est ce que nous signifie le titre du texte de Roberts : \u00ab <em>Bush Proves His Harshest Critics Right<\/em> \u00bb.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 21 mars 2006 \u00e0 09H06<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Avec le troisi\u00e8me anniversaire de la guerre contre l&rsquo;Irak, la critique de l&rsquo;administration Bush atteint de nouveaux sommets de violence, en m\u00eame temps qu&rsquo;une exasp\u00e9ration extr\u00eame. Cela est perceptible essentiellement dans l&rsquo;information alternative, sur le r\u00e9seau, o\u00f9 se trouve le seul espace de libert\u00e9 de critique (aux USA mais aussi dans nombre de nos pays&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[868,4750,2856,3140,4728,2804],"class_list":["post-67372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bush","tag-craig","tag-critique","tag-paul","tag-roberts","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67372"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67372\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}