{"id":67382,"date":"2006-03-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-03-24T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/03\/24\/definition-du-complexe-militaro-industriel\/"},"modified":"2006-03-24T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-03-24T00:00:00","slug":"definition-du-complexe-militaro-industriel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/03\/24\/definition-du-complexe-militaro-industriel\/","title":{"rendered":"D\u00e9finition du complexe militaro-industriel"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>On trouve sur le site <em>Antiwar.com<\/em>, en date du 23 mars, un texte d&rsquo;IPS pr\u00e9sentant  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/ips\/rizvi.php?articleid=8750\" class=\"gen\">une interview<\/a>, par Haider Rizvi, du r\u00e9alisateur du film documentaire <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2380\" class=\"gen\">Why We Fight<\/a>, Eugene Jarecki.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tNous en publions ci-dessous un passage question-r\u00e9ponse sur le complexe militaro-industriel (CMI), parce que la r\u00e9ponse de Jarecki nous para\u00eet donner une bonne d\u00e9finition de la place du CMI dans la structure am\u00e9ricaniste du pouvoir aux USA. Le CMI y est effectivement pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 comme un groupe d&rsquo;int\u00e9r\u00eats (ou de <em>special interests<\/em>) dans un syst\u00e8me de pouvoir qui fonctionne \u00e0 partir d&rsquo;une structure effectivement faite de tels groupes. La puissance et l&rsquo;influence du CMI ne sont nullement le reflet d&rsquo;une tendance nationale m\u00eame si elles rencontrent des tendances de la psychologie am\u00e9ricaniste. Elles sont l&rsquo;effet d&rsquo;une puissance priv\u00e9e qui s&rsquo;est singuli\u00e8rement affirm\u00e9e selon des circonstances donn\u00e9es, dans un pouvoir qui n&rsquo;a aucun caract\u00e8re r\u00e9galien et se d\u00e9finit donc en fonction du rapport des forces des divers groupes d&rsquo;int\u00e9r\u00eats qui y participent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <strong><em>Question:<\/em><\/strong> <em>You highlighted the speech of U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953-1961) in which he expresses his deep concern over the military-industrial complex.&rsquo; Do you agree with those who would rather describe this phenomenon as military-industrial-prison-media complex&rsquo;?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <strong><em>Answer:<\/em><\/strong> <em>Yes, unfortunately, what Eisenhower is talking about is the concern that the interests of corporations have been placed ahead of the interests of the people. That can take many forms, whether it&rsquo;s military-industrial or pharmaceutical or media. There are so many industries in America that can have undue, unwarranted influences on the affairs of the state.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>In many ways, Eisenhower is simply noting the rise of special interests in the United States.<\/em> [But] <em>the military-industrial complex has a special distinction as a special interest. The enormity of its business and the way in which it operates it makes more difficult in times of threats<\/em> [when] <em>you can insulate military-industrial special interests from the kind of oversight and review that others feel might be needed. So the military-industrial complex is a sort of favored nation among special interests.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tPubli\u00e9 le 24 mars 2006 \u00e0 07H46<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On trouve sur le site Antiwar.com, en date du 23 mars, un texte d&rsquo;IPS pr\u00e9sentant une interview, par Haider Rizvi, du r\u00e9alisateur du film documentaire Why We Fight, Eugene Jarecki. Nous en publions ci-dessous un passage question-r\u00e9ponse sur le complexe militaro-industriel (CMI), parce que la r\u00e9ponse de Jarecki nous para\u00eet donner une bonne d\u00e9finition de&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3012,5051,5048,3123,5050,5049],"class_list":["post-67382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-complexe","tag-fight","tag-jarecki","tag-militaro-industriel","tag-we","tag-why"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67382"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67382\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}