Signalons une int\u00e9ressante analyse de l’ancien ambassadeur indien en Turquie, M K Bhadrakumar, sur atimes.com<\/em> en date du \tM K Bhadrakumar nous d\u00e9crit par le menue l’imbroglio de la question de l’\u00e9nergie, entre producteurs et consommateurs, entre anciens (les USA, les Europ\u00e9ens) et nouveaux (Chine, Inde) sur l’\u00e9chiquier du grand jeu \u00e9nergie\/capitalisme globalis\u00e9. Et, tr\u00f4nant au milieu de tout cela, la Russie, dont le retour sur la sc\u00e8ne internationale est \u00e9tourdissant. M K Bhadrakumar nous rapporte ce commentaire subtil : \u00ab As a respected Russian political observer, Vitaliy Tretyakov, editor-in-chief of Politichiskii Klass, recently wrote, Russia today is not a world superpower like the Soviet Union was, but it has preserved its many qualities of a superpower: gigantic territory, huge natural resources, nuclear weapons, space technology, scientific potential, atomic technology and energy resources, a defense industry that is actively working for export … and the permanent membership at the United Nations Security Council.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tTout cela met dans les transes les plus am\u00e9ricanistes nos amis de Washington. Avec la Russie, ils ont soudain l’impression de perdre leur mot \u00e0 dire sur tout ce qui se passe d’important sur la plan\u00e8te. Par cons\u00e9quent, la Russie est d\u00e9cr\u00e9t\u00e9 Ennemi number one<\/em>, un de plus, et l’on va sortir l’arme subtile du regime change<\/em>. Dr\u00f4le de jeu, entonnoir sur la t\u00eate.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLe sage M K Bhadrakumar conclut placidement son analyse : \u00ab The EU and the US are indeed very concerned that Russia has acquired a freedom to behave … at the critical stage of formation of a new architecture of international relations to quote from Lavrov’s article in Rossiskaya Gazeta. The irony and paradox consist in the fact that Russia is turning out to be one of the biggest beneficiaries of the phenomenon of globalization in the post-Soviet era.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb The victor’ ending up as a dependant of the vanquished’ it is a rare occurrence in history. It creates profound psychological problems. It can be the stuff of cold wars.<\/em> \u00bb <\/p>\n<\/p>\n