Weekly Standard<\/em>, est une voix autoris\u00e9e \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tNormalement, les neocons<\/em> sont \u00e9videmment libre-\u00e9changistes, notamment par d\u00e9duction logique de leur position n\u00e9o-wilsonienne d’interventionnisme agressif et d’imposition de la d\u00e9mocratie de type am\u00e9ricaniste, avec ses caract\u00e9ristiques \u00e9conomiques essentiels, aux pays r\u00e9ticents. Mais l’affaire DPW\/ports US rec\u00e8le nombre d’ambigu\u00eft\u00e9s, l’opposition \u00e0 DPW ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e selon des arguments de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 directement li\u00e9s \u00e0 la lutte anti-terroriste.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tL’article analyse l’affaire et prend une tournure critique de certaines interventions (notamment celle d’Hillary Clinton) contre le march\u00e9. Mais la chute nuance tr\u00e8s fortement la critique : les parlementaires et leurs calculs d\u00e9magogiques sont condamnables, mais pas n\u00e9cessairement la cause qu’il d\u00e9fendait : \u00ab But just because there are demagogues abroad in the land does not mean there is not a worrying issue. The board set up to review the national security implications of foreign takeovers has turned down only 1 of more than 1,500 deals that came before it the planned acquisition of Mamco Manufacturing, a maker of aircraft parts, by China National Aero-Technology in 1990. It is so insensitive to the post-9\/11 security concerns of Americans that it did not think it necessary to advise the president that it was approving the management of ports by a state-owned Arab company.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Clearly, a new balance will have to be struck between the economic advantages and the security problems created by free trade in goods and in companies. That has nothing to do with protectionism. Rather, it has to do with legitimate security concerns in a world in which we are engaged in a life-and-death struggle against Muslim terrorists, and in which the Defense Department said only last week that China is gearing up its military to challenge American supremacy. Committed free trading nations such as Australia will have their work out for them in seeing to it that security does not become a cover for protectionism.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 26 mars 2006 \u00e0 17H14<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
L’article de Irwin M. Stelzer, mis en ligne le 21 mars 2006 sur le site du Weekly Standard a l’int\u00e9r\u00eat de pr\u00e9senter succinctement la position n\u00e9o-conservatrice (le Weekly Standard repr\u00e9sente cette tendance aux USA) sur les derniers d\u00e9veloppements aux USA concernant ce qu’on pourrait nommer n\u00e9o-protectionnisme, avec l’affaire DPW (Douba\u00ef)\/ports am\u00e9ricains. (On peut juger que… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5153,2632,1104,1097,4205,3333,3332],"class_list":["post-67388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-doubai","tag-globalisation","tag-neocons","tag-protectionnisme","tag-securite","tag-standard","tag-weekly"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67388\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}