{"id":67395,"date":"2006-03-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-03-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/03\/29\/a-propos-du-jsf-la-norvege-fait-durer-letrange-plaisir\/"},"modified":"2006-03-29T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-03-29T00:00:00","slug":"a-propos-du-jsf-la-norvege-fait-durer-letrange-plaisir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/03\/29\/a-propos-du-jsf-la-norvege-fait-durer-letrange-plaisir\/","title":{"rendered":"A propos du JSF, la Norv\u00e8ge fait durer l&rsquo;\u00e9trange plaisir"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La Norv\u00e8ge devait se prononcer apr\u00e8s-demain sur la poursuite de sa participation au programme JSF. Elle renvoie au 1er juin sa d\u00e9cision, selon les confidences du secr\u00e9taire d&rsquo;\u00c9tat \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense Espen Barth Eide faites \u00e0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aviationweek.com\/<D\" class=\"gen\">Aviation Week<\/a> (num\u00e9ro du 27 mars). D&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, le climat est plut\u00f4t morose et la d\u00e9cision norv\u00e9gienne appara\u00eet plus comme une amabilit\u00e9 diplomatique pour \u00e9viter une rupture trop brutale qu&rsquo;une marche vers la r\u00e9conciliation. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Norway is providing Lockheed Martin with an eight-week stay of execution before it decides whether to abandon participation in the Joint Strike Fighter program.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Originally due to deliver its verdict Apr. 1, State Secretary for Defense Espen Barth Eide told Aviation Week &#038; Space Technology that the decision is being put back to June 1 to allow time for Lockheed Martin to flesh out any proposals, and for Norway to evaluate them. Eide leaves no doubt about the key issue: Without an industrial package, there is no participation. Norwegian aspirations for a role in the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) phase of the JSF program have failed to be met, precipitating the crisis.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t(&#8230;)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>While Eide will not prejudge the outcome of what Lockheed Martin may offer to try to address Norwegian needs, there are those in Oslo and Washington who are skeptical the U.S. company is in a position to actually provide what the Norwegian Labor government needs to stay in the program. I think it&rsquo;s nearly impossible that Lockheed will be able to come up with an acceptable package, says one U.S. industry source. Recent discussions between Lockheed Martin officials and Eide, says the Washington source, were comparatively positive; but discussions between the U.S. company and Norwegian industry were far less so.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 29 mars 2006 \u00e0 07H12<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La Norv\u00e8ge devait se prononcer apr\u00e8s-demain sur la poursuite de sa participation au programme JSF. Elle renvoie au 1er juin sa d\u00e9cision, selon les confidences du secr\u00e9taire d&rsquo;\u00c9tat \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense Espen Barth Eide faites \u00e0 Aviation Week (num\u00e9ro du 27 mars). D&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, le climat est plut\u00f4t morose et la d\u00e9cision norv\u00e9gienne appara\u00eet&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[250,3842],"class_list":["post-67395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-jsf","tag-norvege"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67395"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67395\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}