{"id":67398,"date":"2006-03-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-03-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/03\/29\/la-langue-dacier-de-lord-drayson\/"},"modified":"2006-03-29T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-03-29T00:00:00","slug":"la-langue-dacier-de-lord-drayson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/03\/29\/la-langue-dacier-de-lord-drayson\/","title":{"rendered":"La langue d&rsquo;acier de Lord Drayson"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Notre (toujours) ami Richard North, sp\u00e9cialiste \u00e8s-JSF outre-Manche et eurosceptique, est, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2545\" class=\"gen\">comme nous<\/a>, attentif aux tentatives de <em>damage control<\/em> de l&rsquo;affaire JSF suite \u00e0 la visite de Lord Drayson \u00e0 Washington. Dans ses commentaires <a href=\"http:\/\/eureferendum.blogspot.com\/2006\/03\/jsf-no-decisions-have-been-taken.html\" class=\"gen\">d&rsquo;hier<\/a>, il confirme l&rsquo;\u00e9chec de ces tentatives, et la situation toujours aussi incertaines du programme dans sa composante britannique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tNorth rapporte les d\u00e9bats \u00e0 la Chambre des Communes, avec les agitations diverses t\u00e9moignant de la nervosit\u00e9 exceptionnelle des Britanniques. Les d\u00e9put\u00e9s et les Lords sont de plus en plus passionn\u00e9s par cette affaire, de plus en plus inquiets, agressifs, etc., et le gouvernement de plus en plus mis sur la d\u00e9fensive.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tSignalons ces d\u00e9tails sur le plan B, avec le mot <em>Rafale<\/em> prononc\u00e9 une nouvelle fois. L&rsquo;intervention de Lord Drayson montre que, dans le maniement de la langue de bois, l&rsquo;homme est en acier. (Il semble que, dans les salons londoniens, les plaisanteries et les anecdotes concernant le plan B\/plan Z, et notamment la possibilit\u00e9 d&rsquo;envisager le choix du <em>French Rafale<\/em> sont monnaie courante. La chose se popularise, <em>sort of<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>In the Lords, minutes later, Lord Astor of Hever was tackling Lord Drayson, who wanted to know whether the government will now constitute a sufficiently funded integrated project team to reopen and take forward studies on a marine variant of the Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>All he got from Drayson was the assurance that the necessary actions have been and will continue to be undertaken to ensure that we have the necessary contingency plans for the JSF project. Asked to deny reports that the MoD was considering the Rafale, all Drayson would say is, \u00a0\u00bbI am happy to assure the House that the contingency plans that are needed to maintain our plan B are in place.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 29 mars 2006 \u00e0 14H58<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Notre (toujours) ami Richard North, sp\u00e9cialiste \u00e8s-JSF outre-Manche et eurosceptique, est, comme nous, attentif aux tentatives de damage control de l&rsquo;affaire JSF suite \u00e0 la visite de Lord Drayson \u00e0 Washington. Dans ses commentaires d&rsquo;hier, il confirme l&rsquo;\u00e9chec de ces tentatives, et la situation toujours aussi incertaines du programme dans sa composante britannique. North rapporte&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5224,5179,250,3825],"class_list":["post-67398","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-communes","tag-drayson","tag-jsf","tag-north"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67398","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}