D’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, la perspective politique de la crise iranienne est extr\u00eamement sombre. Des sources europ\u00e9ennes qui suivent directement cette affaire \u00e0 la Commission europ\u00e9enne estiment qu’avec la r\u00e9solution de l’ONU, et sans pr\u00e9juger d’autres dispositions qu’on aurait pu prendre, \u00ab nous allons dans le mur car il n’y a pour l’instant aucune perspective d’accord, absolument aucune. Plus encore, les divergences \u00e0 l’int\u00e9rieur du soi-disant front europ\u00e9en sont tr\u00e8s grandes et ne tarderont pas \u00e0 appara\u00eetre en pleine lumi\u00e8re. Du point de vue europ\u00e9en et transatlantique, cela pourrait bien valoir la crise irakienne<\/em> \u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tUne autre interpr\u00e9tation (ou une interpr\u00e9tation de plus, l’une n’excluant pas l’autre) des inqui\u00e9tudes britanniques concernant les liens avec les USA, telles qu’on les mentionne dans un autre Bloc Notes<\/a> aujourd’hui, concerne cette affaire iranienne. La visite de Condi Rice n’aurait pas vraiment rassur\u00e9 les Britanniques. Sur cet aspect des choses, on cite des extraits d’un texte de Mary Riddell, \u00e9galement dans The Observer<\/em> du 2 avril<\/a>. (La r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 Chatham House, lieu de rencontre de l’institut RUSI britannique et lieu sacr\u00e9 o\u00f9 l’on peut trouver les v\u00e9ritables pr\u00e9occupations de l’establishment<\/em> britannique, est significative.) :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab On the night Condi began her tour, I sat on a Chatham House panel discussing whether US military action against Iran is hype or a possibility. Hardly anyone in an audience of several hundred thought the threat outlandish. Already the quadrille that preceded the Iraq war is being danced again. Exiles in Washington whisper of a regime ripe for change and, quite wrongly, of a people poised to garland western liberators. The UN moves towards possible sanctions: The threat of WMD hangs in the air.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb Once again, Britain is embroiled. Long ago, when Iran was a minor issue, Straw’s old best friend, Colin Powell, handed the problem over to Britain, France and Germany. His view was that Europe would fail, and he was right. Powell’s successor could be forgiven for thinking, as she negotiated Iranian intransigence and Blackburn puddles, that there are some things her buddy Jack could not organise, even in a brewery.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb So now it’s over to her. Only the optimistic would detect an inner dove in Condi Rice. The US policy on non-proliferation is riven by hypocrisy, but no one except a fool would be happy if a President who thinks Israel should be wiped off the map were to acquire nuclear weapons. Unless one side blinks, or diplomacy prevails, there are two likely outcomes. Either Iran gets the bomb, or the US strikes first. Of these hideous choices, the second is the greater threat to world stability.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb As the stakes rise, Jack Straw has concerns beyond whether Condi will wear her Blackburn Rovers strip with pride. Though they did not seem to notice, the protesters who heckled her have bigger worries too. It’s not about getting Dr Rice miraculously to end this war. It’s about stopping her embarking on the next one.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 2 avril 2006 \u00e0 13H54<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" D’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, la perspective politique de la crise iranienne est extr\u00eamement sombre. Des sources europ\u00e9ennes qui suivent directement cette affaire \u00e0 la Commission europ\u00e9enne estiment qu’avec la r\u00e9solution de l’ONU, et sans pr\u00e9juger d’autres dispositions qu’on aurait pu prendre, \u00ab nous allons dans le mur car il n’y a pour l’instant aucune perspective d’accord,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4639,4640,2773,3306,5242,3775],"class_list":["post-67411","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-chatham","tag-house","tag-iran","tag-rice","tag-riddell","tag-straw"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67411","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67411"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67411\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67411"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67411"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67411"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}