La France a un alli\u00e9 de petit poids mais de grand prestige et d’une influence certaine, avec l’un des dirigeants europ\u00e9ens les plus \u00e9cout\u00e9s prenant parti en sa faveur dans la querelle<\/a> qui l’oppose \u00e0 la Commission. Le Premier ministre luxembourgeois Jean-Claude Juncker fait une critique pr\u00e9cise et aigu\u00eb de la position de la Commission europ\u00e9enne. (Dans une interview \u00e0 Financial Times Deutschland<\/em>, cit\u00e9e par EUObserver<\/a> aujourd’hui.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab Mr Juncker said I criticise the communication strategy of the commissionIt gives the impression that everyone who puts questions to planned or ongoing mergers should automatically be a protectionist. That is a very a-political approach.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb While indicating he rejects the term economic patriotism,’ used by French prime minister Dominique de Villepin to promote his policy, Mr Juncker also showed he supports Paris’ interventionism in substance, saying he understands that European governments resist a Europe which is only interested in the market.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t(…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab Mr Juncker said I cannot see why there should be hostile takeovers in the EU. He demanded that in merger situations, the interests of employees and regions be taken better into account. Pure market ideologists overlook that this is about the fate of people, he said.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 3 avril 2006 \u00e0 17H58<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" La France a un alli\u00e9 de petit poids mais de grand prestige et d’une influence certaine, avec l’un des dirigeants europ\u00e9ens les plus \u00e9cout\u00e9s prenant parti en sa faveur dans la querelle qui l’oppose \u00e0 la Commission. Le Premier ministre luxembourgeois Jean-Claude Juncker fait une critique pr\u00e9cise et aigu\u00eb de la position de la Commission… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1463,4751,4614,4663,1097],"class_list":["post-67419","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-commission","tag-economique","tag-juncker","tag-patriotisme","tag-protectionnisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67419","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67419"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67419\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}