{"id":67436,"date":"2006-04-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-04-08T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/08\/rumsfeld-rice-scandale-dans-la-famille\/"},"modified":"2006-04-08T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-04-08T00:00:00","slug":"rumsfeld-rice-scandale-dans-la-famille","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/08\/rumsfeld-rice-scandale-dans-la-famille\/","title":{"rendered":"Rumsfeld-Rice, scandale dans la famille"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>En d\u00e9roulant les nouvelles hier, sur la divergence de vues entre <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2580\" class=\"gen\">Rumsfeld<\/a> et <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2582\" class=\"gen\">Rice<\/a>, nous agissions d&rsquo;un cur l\u00e9ger. Nous ne pensions pas qu&rsquo;il fall\u00fbt prendre tout cela trop au s\u00e9rieux. Julian Borger, du <em>Guardian<\/em>, s&rsquo;en charge <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/Iraq\/Story\/0,,1749540,00.html\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tVoici le rapport que Borger fait de cette temp\u00eate dans un verre d&rsquo;eau (en omettant d&rsquo;ailleurs <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2582\" class=\"gen\">l&rsquo;intervention<\/a> de Rumsfeld pour apaiser les choses, lors d&rsquo;une conf\u00e9rence de presse, mercredi) : \u00ab <em>The US secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, was attempting to defuse a spat with the defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, yesterday over the number of mistakes made by the US so far in Iraq. Ms Rice said her relationship with Mr Rumsfeld couldn&rsquo;t be better, even after he had told a radio interviewer that he did not know what she was talking about when she told a UK thinktank last week that the US had made thousands of tactical errors in Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t(&#8230;)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Meanwhile Ms Rice was under pressure to explain her tactical errors remark. Mr Rumsfeld was withering in his response, suggesting she did not understand warfare. I don&rsquo;t know what she was talking about, to be perfectly honest, he told a radio station in Fargo, North Dakota, earlier this week. The reality in war is this &#8230; The enemy watches what you do and then adjusts to that, so you have to constantly adjust and change your tactics &#8230; If someone says well, that&rsquo;s a tactical mistake, then I guess it&rsquo;s a lack of understanding &#8230; of what warfare is about. On Thursday, Ms Rice said he had not seen what she had said. I guess I shouldn&rsquo;t use figures of speech, she added.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tOn serait tent\u00e9 de dire comme le grand Will,  <em>much ado for nothing<\/em>. Cela n&#8217;emp\u00eache  pas quelques observations : le constat qu&rsquo;\u00e0 Washington, dans nos temps m\u00e9diatico-virtualistes, rien n&rsquo;\u00e9chappe \u00e0 la tendance au gonflement de la moindre nouvelle r\u00e9percutant une m\u00e9sentente ou une divergence au sein de cette administration. Le constat, \u00e9galement, que ce n&rsquo;est qu&rsquo;un juste retour des choses, cette administration ayant syst\u00e9matiquement jou\u00e9 des m\u00e9dias, des fausses informations ou des informations manipul\u00e9es, des d\u00e9formations et ainsi de suite.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 8 avril 2006 \u00e0 11H54<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En d\u00e9roulant les nouvelles hier, sur la divergence de vues entre Rumsfeld et Rice, nous agissions d&rsquo;un cur l\u00e9ger. Nous ne pensions pas qu&rsquo;il fall\u00fbt prendre tout cela trop au s\u00e9rieux. Julian Borger, du Guardian, s&rsquo;en charge aujourd&rsquo;hui. Voici le rapport que Borger fait de cette temp\u00eate dans un verre d&rsquo;eau (en omettant d&rsquo;ailleurs l&rsquo;intervention&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5265,3306,569,5245],"class_list":["post-67436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-erreurs","tag-rice","tag-rumsfeld","tag-tactiques"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67436"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67436\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}