{"id":67455,"date":"2006-04-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-04-14T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/14\/les-generaux-revoltes-et-les-neocons-meme-combat\/"},"modified":"2006-04-14T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-04-14T00:00:00","slug":"les-generaux-revoltes-et-les-neocons-meme-combat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/14\/les-generaux-revoltes-et-les-neocons-meme-combat\/","title":{"rendered":"Les g\u00e9n\u00e9raux \u201cr\u00e9volt\u00e9s\u201d et les <em>neocons<\/em>, m\u00eame combat\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La complication et le d\u00e9sordre extraordinaires de la vie politique washingtonienne conduisent \u00e0 des situation in\u00e9dites. La <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2600\" class=\"gen\">r\u00e9volte des g\u00e9n\u00e9raux<\/a> est un bon exemple de cette situation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes g\u00e9n\u00e9raux se r\u00e9voltent contre Rumsfeld, certes, mais, d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on plus g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, contre la guerre en Irak, la fa\u00e7on dont elle fut con\u00e7ue, ses motifs (ou absence de motifs) de base, les moyens qui y furent affect\u00e9s, etc. C&rsquo;est dire si les <em>neocons<\/em> en place au Pentagone jusqu&rsquo;en 2005 (Wolfowitz, Feith) sont aussi vis\u00e9s que Rumsfeld. Pourtant, les premi\u00e8res r\u00e9actions des <em>neocons<\/em> en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral sont loin d&rsquo;\u00eatre d\u00e9favorables.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe <em>Daily Telegraph<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/main.jhtml?xml=\/news\/2006\/04\/14\/wus14.xml\" class=\"gen\">d&rsquo;aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a> interroge un <em>neocon<\/em> notoire et obtient une r\u00e9ponse grave, pleine de compr\u00e9hension implicite pour les g\u00e9n\u00e9raux: \u00ab <em>Tom Donnelly, the editor of the Armed Forces Journal and an analyst at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think-tank that backed the war, said the new attacks were a grave development. There is a lot of anger and frustration among army and marine officers. It is one thing to have retired officers commenting about policy, as has happened before, but the ad hominem attacks show a deep anger.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;explication est l&rsquo;hostilit\u00e9 profonde, quoique assez r\u00e9cente, des <em>neocons<\/em> \u00e0 l&rsquo;encontre de Rumsfeld. Comme les g\u00e9n\u00e9raux rebelles, les <em>neocons<\/em> veulent la d\u00e9mission de Rumsfeld, notamment parce qu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;a pas d\u00e9ploy\u00e9 assez de forces en Irak. Sur ce dernier point, les g\u00e9n\u00e9raux sont d&rsquo;accord, mais ils condamnent en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral formellement cette guerre irakienne qui est l&rsquo;enfant ch\u00e9ri des <em>neocons<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes <em>neocons<\/em> soutiennent donc les g\u00e9n\u00e9raux mais se trouveront tr\u00e8s vite en opposition \u00e0 eux sur le cas de l&rsquo;attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran, qu&rsquo;ils veulent avec une ferveur nouvelle, proche de celle qu&rsquo;ils avaient pour la guerre en Irak, et que les g\u00e9n\u00e9raux ne veulent pas.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 14 avril 2006 \u00e0 15H36<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La complication et le d\u00e9sordre extraordinaires de la vie politique washingtonienne conduisent \u00e0 des situation in\u00e9dites. La r\u00e9volte des g\u00e9n\u00e9raux est un bon exemple de cette situation. Les g\u00e9n\u00e9raux se r\u00e9voltent contre Rumsfeld, certes, mais, d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on plus g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, contre la guerre en Irak, la fa\u00e7on dont elle fut con\u00e7ue, ses motifs (ou absence de&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5160,1104,5290,569],"class_list":["post-67455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-generaux","tag-neocons","tag-revoltes","tag-rumsfeld"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67455"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67455\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}