{"id":67459,"date":"2006-04-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-04-15T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/15\/surprise-surprise-les-generaux-rebelles-divisent-meme-les-neocons\/"},"modified":"2006-04-15T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-04-15T00:00:00","slug":"surprise-surprise-les-generaux-rebelles-divisent-meme-les-neocons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/15\/surprise-surprise-les-generaux-rebelles-divisent-meme-les-neocons\/","title":{"rendered":"Surprise, surprise\u2026 Les \u201cg\u00e9n\u00e9raux rebelles\u201d divisent m\u00eame les <em>neocons<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Les signes ne cessent de s&rsquo;accumuler de l&rsquo;installation d&rsquo;un d\u00e9sordre suppl\u00e9mentaire \u00e0 Washington, par les effets multiples de la r\u00e9volte des g\u00e9n\u00e9raux. On ignore s&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;un d\u00e9sordre cr\u00e9ateur, comme le capitalisme l&rsquo;affectionne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa division s&rsquo;installe m\u00eame au cur du camp n\u00e9o-conservateur. L&rsquo;article <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/04\/14\/AR2006041401649_pf.html\" class=\"gen\">d&rsquo;aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a> du Washington <em>Post<\/em> oppose,  malicieusement parce que d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9ment, ou par le hasard des choses ?  deux n\u00e9o-conservateurs fameux. L&rsquo;un (Perle) est pour Rumsfeld et m\u00e9prisant envers les g\u00e9n\u00e9raux, l&rsquo;autre (Kristoll) est contre Rumsfeld et affectueux avec les g\u00e9n\u00e9raux.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Rumsfeld&rsquo;s admirers, though, characterized the complaining generals as malcontents unhappy with the secretary&rsquo;s attempts to restructure the armed forces for the 21st century. Look, he&rsquo;s trying to change an institution that is very set in its ways, and that&rsquo;s not easy, said Richard N. Perle, former chairman of the Defense Policy Board. You&rsquo;ve got some disgruntled former officers. It&rsquo;s no big deal.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Longtime Rumsfeld critics said the generals were speaking from genuine concern. They really are acting out of patriotism, said William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard. This is not fun for them. They&rsquo;re reluctant to step forward in this way, and for good reason. . . . But I believe they&rsquo;re doing it because they believe that Rumsfeld is endangering the course of U.S. foreign policy.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 15 avril 2006 \u00e0 15H05<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Les signes ne cessent de s&rsquo;accumuler de l&rsquo;installation d&rsquo;un d\u00e9sordre suppl\u00e9mentaire \u00e0 Washington, par les effets multiples de la r\u00e9volte des g\u00e9n\u00e9raux. On ignore s&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;un d\u00e9sordre cr\u00e9ateur, comme le capitalisme l&rsquo;affectionne. La division s&rsquo;installe m\u00eame au cur du camp n\u00e9o-conservateur. L&rsquo;article d&rsquo;aujourd&rsquo;hui du Washington Post oppose, malicieusement parce que d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9ment, ou par le&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5160,3346,1104,3213,5290,569],"class_list":["post-67459","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-generaux","tag-kristoll","tag-neocons","tag-perle","tag-revoltes","tag-rumsfeld"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67459","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67459"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67459\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}