{"id":67465,"date":"2006-04-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-04-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/17\/le-royaume-uni-envisage-de-defendre-son-industrie-gaziere-serait-ce-au-prix-des-principes-qui-font-sa-gloire-internationale\/"},"modified":"2006-04-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-04-17T00:00:00","slug":"le-royaume-uni-envisage-de-defendre-son-industrie-gaziere-serait-ce-au-prix-des-principes-qui-font-sa-gloire-internationale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/17\/le-royaume-uni-envisage-de-defendre-son-industrie-gaziere-serait-ce-au-prix-des-principes-qui-font-sa-gloire-internationale\/","title":{"rendered":"Le Royaume-Uni envisage de d\u00e9fendre son industrie gazi\u00e8re, serait-ce au prix des principes qui font sa gloire internationale"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le <em>Financial Times<\/em> du <a href=\"https:\/\/registration.ft.com\/registration\/barrier?referer=http:\/\/news.ft.com\/home\/europe&#038;location=http%3A\/\/news.ft.com\/cms\/s\/ac558d4a-cd7c-11da-afcd-0000779e2340.html\" class=\"gen\">16 avril<\/a> nous annonce que le gouvernement britannique repense son attitude vis-\u00e0-vis de son industrie gazi\u00e8re (\u00e9nergie) dans le sens d&rsquo;une protection de cette industrie contre les acquisitions \u00e9trang\u00e8res.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tVoici le texte accessible du FT (le reste payant) : \u00ab <em>The UK considered changing its merger control regime this year to block a potential takeover of Centrica, the UK&rsquo;s biggest gas supplier, by Gazprom of Russia, a move that remains an option to thwart any bid that threatens energy security.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Alan Johnson, the trade and industry secretary who has been a vocal critic of protectionism in the US and Europe, was briefed with other ministers in February on the legal changes required to allow them to block a rumoured bid by Gazprom for Centrica, the Financial Times has learnt.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEffectivement, Johnson ne manquait jamais, depuis deux ans, de faire, avec la plus grande v\u00e9h\u00e9mence, la le\u00e7on hyper-lib\u00e9rale au reste de l&rsquo;Europe. Nous attendons avec impatience ses conseils nouvellement tremp\u00e9s au miel de l&rsquo;exp\u00e9rience Gazprom.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tSi l&rsquo;on place cette orientation n\u00e9o-protectionniste autour de l&rsquo;industrie gazi\u00e8re britannique \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re de la r\u00e9elle signification de la nouvelle <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2575\" class=\"gen\">Defense Industrial Policy<\/a>, on appr\u00e9ciera combien, avec une humilit\u00e9 qui les honore, les Britanniques s&rsquo;inspirent du mod\u00e8le fran\u00e7ais. C&rsquo;est une belle d\u00e9marche d&rsquo;unit\u00e9 europ\u00e9aniste.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 17 avril 2006 \u00e0 15H12<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Financial Times du 16 avril nous annonce que le gouvernement britannique repense son attitude vis-\u00e0-vis de son industrie gazi\u00e8re (\u00e9nergie) dans le sens d&rsquo;une protection de cette industrie contre les acquisitions \u00e9trang\u00e8res. Voici le texte accessible du FT (le reste payant) : \u00ab The UK considered changing its merger control regime this year to&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5298,2866,4035,5299,2758],"class_list":["post-67465","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-gas","tag-johnson","tag-liberalisme","tag-neo-protectionniste","tag-uk"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67465"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67465\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67465"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67465"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}