Weinstein<\/a> situe le candidat populiste en t\u00eate au P\u00e9rou, Ollanta Humala, dans le contexte d’un monde latino-am\u00e9ricain en \u00e9bullition. Parti il y a quelques mois d’une base tr\u00e8s r\u00e9duite (11% des intentions de vote), Humala est en t\u00eate depuis le premier tour de l’\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle et a de fortes chances d’\u00eatre \u00e9lu.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tSe pr\u00e9sentant comme populiste, Humala est plus un nationaliste qu’un socialiste. Weinstein d\u00e9finit le personnage politique, notant par cons\u00e9quent les diff\u00e9rences par rapport \u00e0 la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence (Chavez) de l’actuelle dynamique du continent latino-am\u00e9ricain : \u00ab Although Humala has sometimes expressed support for Chavez’s experiment, is backed by Venezuela’s president, and most analysts have placed him in the left-populist camp, the former lieutenant colonel has made it clear in his characteristically blunt language that we are not Chavistas. In fact, Humala is a right populist an ultra-nationalist who shares with his left counterparts a base in the poverty-stricken sectors of the population and a statist orientation, but who entertains a vision of national unity and strength Twenty-first Century Nationalization rather than class-based socialism.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Ultra-nationalism, the extreme form of which is classical fascism, is the functional alternative to socialism when weak parliamentary governments are unable to manage demands from below in societies that are deeply divided between rich and poor. The fact that grassroots dissent in Peru has been articulated in nationalist rather than socialist terms reflects the country’s recent history, in which a violent Maoist movement the Shining Path pre-empted the self-organization of the indigenous population that occurred in Bolivia and Ecuador, and foreclosed the possibility of a vigorous left opposition. In many respects, ultra-nationalism poses greater threats to regional stability than does the new socialism because it plays on grievances against neighboring states in addition to challenging Western-style globalization.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLa question que pose la mont\u00e9e d’Humala et de la tendance qu’il repr\u00e9sente est de savoir ce qui l’emportera : ses diff\u00e9rences avec le mouvement populiste de gauche ou ses similitudes? Humala se dit anti-globalisation mais pas anti-am\u00e9ricain. On voit mal la coh\u00e9rence de cette affirmation puisque la globalisation \u00e9quivaut \u00e0 l’am\u00e9ricanisation et vice-versa. Plus que les choix des uns et des autres, c’est l’adversaire qui r\u00e9glera la question pos\u00e9e. La puissance de la globalisation contre laquelle l’une et l’autre tendance luttent est incomparablement plus grande que les diff\u00e9rences qui les s\u00e9parent. Au bout du compte et si l’on admet que la v\u00e9ritable d\u00e9finition du populisme est, comme en Am\u00e9rique du Nord (rien \u00e0 voir avec la "d\u00e9monisation" europ\u00e9enne du terme), l’opposition au capitalisme globalis\u00e9 et \u00e0 la destruction de la souverainet\u00e9 et de l’identit\u00e9 nationale, les deux tendances devraient repr\u00e9senter \u00e0 terme, en Am\u00e9rique Latine, l’aile gauche et l’aile droite d’un m\u00eame mouvement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 19 avril 2006 \u00e0 12H53<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Dans son analyse du jour sur le site PINR, Michael A. Weinstein situe le candidat populiste en t\u00eate au P\u00e9rou, Ollanta Humala, dans le contexte d’un monde latino-am\u00e9ricain en \u00e9bullition. Parti il y a quelques mois d’une base tr\u00e8s r\u00e9duite (11% des intentions de vote), Humala est en t\u00eate depuis le premier tour de l’\u00e9lection… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3304,2632,5301,4271,5302,5303,5304],"class_list":["post-67473","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-chavez","tag-globalisation","tag-humala","tag-nationalisme","tag-perou","tag-populisme","tag-socialisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67473"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67473\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}