{"id":67480,"date":"2006-04-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-04-20T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/20\/straw-blair-un-duo-jamais-vu\/"},"modified":"2006-04-20T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-04-20T00:00:00","slug":"straw-blair-un-duo-jamais-vu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/20\/straw-blair-un-duo-jamais-vu\/","title":{"rendered":"Straw-Blair, un duo jamais vu"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La situation est \u00e9trange. Nous voulons parler de la situation \u00e9ventuelle de m\u00e9sentente entre <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2592\" class=\"gen\">Blair et Straw<\/a> sur la question de la crise iranienne. Si l&rsquo;on en croit <a href=\"http:\/\/news.independent.co.uk\/uk\/politics\/article358778.ece\" class=\"gen\">The Independent<\/a> d&rsquo;aujourd&rsquo;hui, le secr\u00e9taire au Foreign Office Jack Straw peut se pr\u00e9valoir du soutien europ\u00e9en dans ce qui appara\u00eet, selon le quotidien, comme un affrontement avec Tony Blair sur la question du soutien de la position US (toutes les options sont sur la table, y compris une attaque militaire). C&rsquo;est ainsi qu&rsquo;on pourrait interpr\u00e9ter ce commentaire de <em>The Independent<\/em>, notant, \u00e0 propos de la position de Straw (c&rsquo;est nous qui soulignons en gras le passage qui nous importe) :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>But most Labour MPs support Mr Straw&rsquo;s strategy and would revolt if Mr Blair showed any sign of lending support to a US strike against Iran.<\/em> <strong><em>Mr Straw was given tacit support at a meeting of European foreign ministers in Luxembourg last week.<\/em><\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>France understands Mr Blair&rsquo;s argument that keeping the military option on the table would keep up the pressure on Iran. But it is to urge London to press the Bush administration to soften its approach so it no longer treats Iran as a rogue state but engages in a wider dialogue with Tehran on terrorism, the Middle East peace process and oil.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCela ne signifie pas que Blair soit pr\u00eat \u00e0 participer \u00e0 une attaque, mais, semble-t-il, \u00e0 soutenir une telle action de la part des Am\u00e9ricains. (Les informations dans le sens d&rsquo;une <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2609\" class=\"gen\">non-participation<\/a> britannique restent plausibles.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa situation britannique reste tr\u00e8s embrouill\u00e9e. Elle est aussi compl\u00e8tement in\u00e9dite. Observer une opposition \u00e9ventuelle aussi affirm\u00e9e sur un probl\u00e8me de cette importance entre un PM britannique et son secr\u00e9taire au Foreign Office est d\u00e9j\u00e0 une raret\u00e9 ; mais la voir prolong\u00e9e par une intervention ext\u00e9rieure, au point qu&rsquo;on puisse parler de soutien tacite des Europ\u00e9ens apport\u00e9 \u00e0 Straw, c&rsquo;est tout \u00e0 fait nouveau.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 20 avril 2006 \u00e0 19H49<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La situation est \u00e9trange. Nous voulons parler de la situation \u00e9ventuelle de m\u00e9sentente entre Blair et Straw sur la question de la crise iranienne. Si l&rsquo;on en croit The Independent d&rsquo;aujourd&rsquo;hui, le secr\u00e9taire au Foreign Office Jack Straw peut se pr\u00e9valoir du soutien europ\u00e9en dans ce qui appara\u00eet, selon le quotidien, comme un affrontement avec&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[705,2773,3775],"class_list":["post-67480","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-blair","tag-iran","tag-straw"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67480","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67480"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67480\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67480"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67480"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}