{"id":67493,"date":"2006-04-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-04-24T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/24\/le-war-street-journal-gw-il-est-temps-detre-serieux\/"},"modified":"2006-04-24T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-04-24T00:00:00","slug":"le-war-street-journal-gw-il-est-temps-detre-serieux","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/24\/le-war-street-journal-gw-il-est-temps-detre-serieux\/","title":{"rendered":"Le War Street Journal<\/em>: GW, il est temps d’\u00eatre s\u00e9rieux\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

Le Wall Street Journal<\/em> (War Street Journal<\/em> pour les amis) avertit GW Bush, dans son \u00e9dito du 21 avril, qu’il est d\u00e9sormais temps d’\u00eatre s\u00e9rieux. Il veut dire : \u00e0 propos de l’Iran.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’\u00e9dito est bien fait, mod\u00e9r\u00e9 dans la forme, apr\u00e8s tout assez sympa. Il ne rejette pas du tout l’option diplomatique. Au contraire, il faut l’examiner, en sachant tr\u00e8s bien qu’elle ne r\u00e9ussira pas, et que si elle r\u00e9ussit tout de m\u00eame, ce sera une tromperie de la part de l’Iran. Le portrait fait par WSJ de l’Iran est mod\u00e9r\u00e9ment apocalyptique, c’est-\u00e0-dire s\u00fbr d’exploser au bout du compte : un r\u00e9gime minoritaire, l’irrespect de ses engagements internationaux, le d\u00e9veloppement de missiles balistiques, des livraisons d’armes ill\u00e9gales \u00e0 des insurg\u00e9s, un pr\u00e9sident z\u00e9lote qui brandit la foudre au nom de Dieu. Bref, on croirait qu’il parle de GW Bush en Am\u00e9rique, avec la diff\u00e9rence que GW a la bombe, ce qui le rend infiniment sage et propre \u00e0 conduire une action de r\u00e9torsion des torts.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe War Street Journal<\/em> ne veut pas la guerre, surtout pas, mais comme tout le reste est impossible, que tous les alli\u00e9s sont pr\u00eats \u00e0 trahir (y compris le Britt Jack Straw while British Foreign Minister Jack Straw has made a career of trying to cultivate the mullahs<\/em> \u00bb), que les s\u00e9nateurs (US) jouent aux munichois, bref, il est temps que GW rendosse son armure historique et \u00e9clatante. Au boulot, proclame le WSJ<\/a>, l’Histoire n’attend pas :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Our point today is not to advocate any specific course of action. But the Administration can’t postpone any longer a candid discussion about the nature and urgency of the Iranian threat. That discussion must include the Congress; this would be helpful not least as a way of smoking out exactly what Senator Lugar and his fellow-grand bargainers are really proposing as an alternative to sanctions or force. If they think an Iranian nuke is acceptable, they should say so.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Above all, the President must begin to educate the American public about what is at stake in Iran and what the U.S. might be prepared to do about it. Until he does so, he will be hostage to a series of increasingly distressing Tehran announcements, the pace and timing of which will be dictated by the clerics and zealots who wish us ill.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 24 avril 2006 \u00e0 14H48<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le Wall Street Journal (War Street Journal pour les amis) avertit GW Bush, dans son \u00e9dito du 21 avril, qu’il est d\u00e9sormais temps d’\u00eatre s\u00e9rieux. Il veut dire : \u00e0 propos de l’Iran. L’\u00e9dito est bien fait, mod\u00e9r\u00e9 dans la forme, apr\u00e8s tout assez sympa. Il ne rejette pas du tout l’option diplomatique. Au contraire,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2645,2773,3823,3372,3132],"class_list":["post-67493","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-guerre","tag-iran","tag-journal","tag-street","tag-wall"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67493","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67493"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67493\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67493"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67493"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67493"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}