{"id":67494,"date":"2006-04-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-04-24T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/24\/madeleine-en-est-malade\/"},"modified":"2006-04-24T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-04-24T00:00:00","slug":"madeleine-en-est-malade","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/04\/24\/madeleine-en-est-malade\/","title":{"rendered":"Madeleine en est malade"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Lors du lancement de l&rsquo;aventure irakienne, l&rsquo;ancienne secr\u00e9taire d&rsquo;\u00c9tat Madeleine Albright avait une vue critique de ce projet mais restait mod\u00e9r\u00e9e dans cette critique. Elle fit son devoir de membre \u00e9minent de l&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em> et apporta un soutien du bout des l\u00e8vres au moment de l&rsquo;attaque.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes termes qu&rsquo;elle emploie d\u00e9sormais pour d\u00e9crire son sentiment sont d&rsquo;une singuli\u00e8re violence. Ils rendent compte de l&rsquo;\u00e9tat d&rsquo;esprit d&rsquo;affrontement, de frustration, de f\u00e9rocit\u00e9 qui r\u00e8gne aujourd&rsquo;hui dans l&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em> am\u00e9ricaniste devant le d\u00e9sastre de l&rsquo;entreprise bushiste.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tMadeleine Albright a 69 ans. Ses r\u00e9ponses s\u00e8ches et sans r\u00e9plique \u00e0 quelques questions du New York <em>Times<\/em>, le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/04\/23\/magazine\/23wwln_q4.html?_r=1&#038;oref=slogin&#038;pagewanted=print\" class=\"gen\">23 avril<\/a>, ajoutent encore \u00e0 la violence du contenu.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <strong><em>As the secretary of state under President Clinton, how do you feel when you read the newspapers today?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Sick. A lot of the things that we worked on for eight years have unraveled. It is very hard.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <strong><em>What do you consider the greatest mistake of this administration?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>What really troubles me is that democracy is getting a bad name because it is identified with imposition and occupation. I&rsquo;m for democracy, but imposing democracy is an oxymoron. People have to choose democracy, and it has to come up from below.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <strong><em>Did you see Saddam Hussein as a threat to this country?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>He was horrible. But I did not think he was an imminent threat to the United States. You can&rsquo;t go to war with everybody you dislike. I think Iraq may end up being one of the worst disasters in American foreign policy.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 24 avril 2006 \u00e0 18H03<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lors du lancement de l&rsquo;aventure irakienne, l&rsquo;ancienne secr\u00e9taire d&rsquo;\u00c9tat Madeleine Albright avait une vue critique de ce projet mais restait mod\u00e9r\u00e9e dans cette critique. Elle fit son devoir de membre \u00e9minent de l&rsquo;establishment et apporta un soutien du bout des l\u00e8vres au moment de l&rsquo;attaque. Les termes qu&rsquo;elle emploie d\u00e9sormais pour d\u00e9crire son sentiment sont&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1007,868,934,857],"class_list":["post-67494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-albright","tag-bush","tag-clinton","tag-irak"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67494"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67494\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}