Straw<\/a> a-t-il \u00e9t\u00e9 liquid\u00e9 par un complot, parce qu’il s’opposait \u00e0 l’intervention contre l’Iran? Si oui, quel sera le r\u00e9sultat ? Pourquoi pas celui d’isoler et d’abattre d\u00e9finitivement Blair en lui faisant prendre une position (pro-interventionniste contre l’Iran) qui soul\u00e8vera la majorit\u00e9 de son parti contre lui et poussera Brown \u00e0 devenir anti-interventionniste (anti-US dans ce cas) pour avoir la peau de son ami-rival \u00e0 mort? Et ainsi de suite.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tVoici les extraits des notes de Madsen, en date du 4 mai :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00ab International neocon ploy to discredit anti-U.S. politicians in countries ranging from Europe to Latin America. The recent so-called \u00a0\u00bbscandal\u00a0\u00bb in France said to involve French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin (a notable anti-Iraq war diplomat when he served as Foreign Minister) is nothing more than a continuation of the neocon Big Lie practice. In this case, French and other international media neocons have claimed DeVillepin orchestrated a scandal involving French Interior Minister and presidential candidate Nicolas Sarkozy. Sarkozy is a strong supporter of Israel’s theocratic kleptocracy and a darling of global neocon interests. The Sarkozy scandal was said to have involved bribes paid to him in numbered bank accounts in Luxembourg. The Clearstream affair said to involve bribery payments to Sarkozy in return for a deal to sell French frigates to Taiwan is claimed by Sarkozy to be a deliberate smear. DeVillepin ordered French intelligence to investigate Sarkozy. Interestingly, DeVillepin argued that as Foreign Minister, it was his job to investigate Sarkozy’s possible involvement with mafia money. Sarkozy’s major political supporters are tied to the Russian-Israeli-Ukrainian mafia that has been capitalizing on the Iraq war, nuclear proliferation involving the A Q Khan network, diamond smuggling financing of \u00a0\u00bbAl Qaeda,\u00a0\u00bb and drug smuggling.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Meanwhile, neocon media are spinning the story that Mexico’s leftist presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has slipped to second place in polls that have shown him as much as ten percentage points ahead of his two rivals. In Obrador’s case, his two conservative rivals have the support of Carlos Slim, the world’s third richest man and a Silvio Berlusconi-style media mogul who dominates Mexican business and politics. With the neocon media arrayed against him, it is no wonder Obrador is reported as slipping in polls to his closest conservative rival, Felipe Calderon, the Energy Minister under Vicente Fox and someone with close ties to the oil industry.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb With so much neocon domination of the global media, DeVillepin and Obrador cannot get fair coverage. <\/em>[WayneMadsen Report] will strive to break through the neocon fog and report the facts.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tD’autre part, et pour conclure sur le paradoxe et l’incertitude, voyez ce que le m\u00eame Wayne Madsen fait de l’Anglais Jack Straw \u00e0 l’occasion de sa liquidation, un homme des neocons<\/em> ! : \u00ab One of the arch neocons is out as British Foreign Secretary. Jack Straw, one of the co-conspirators in the Iraq war and a darling of the global neocon movement, is out as British Foreign Secretary after Tony Blair’s New Labor suffered a drubbing in yesterday’s local elections in England.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 7 mai 2006 \u00e0 11H38<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Un de nos lecteurs, Fred, soul\u00e8ve l’hypoth\u00e8se d’un complot contre Villepin au travers de l’affaire Clearstream. Ci-apr\u00e8s, quelques extraits des commentaires r\u00e9cents de Wayne Madsen sur son site qui vont conforter et\/ou troubler notre lecteur. Quant \u00e0 nous, nous nous permettrons de nous montrer sans avis r\u00e9el sur toutes ces rumeurs de complot. Sans doute… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5353,4811,3775,3803],"class_list":["post-67534","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-clearstream","tag-madsen","tag-straw","tag-villepin"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67534","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67534"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67534\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}