{"id":67540,"date":"2006-05-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-09T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/09\/nuts-ou-absurd\/"},"modified":"2006-05-09T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-05-09T00:00:00","slug":"nuts-ou-absurd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/09\/nuts-ou-absurd\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cNuts<\/em>\u201d ou \u201cabsurd<\/em>\u201d?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les mots ont souvent le poids de l’importance des circonstances. Bref, fa\u00e7on de parler, m\u00eame s’ils sont courts ils en disent long.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe mot nuts<\/em>, bref commentaire de Jack Straw sur la possibilit\u00e9 \u00e9voqu\u00e9e d’une attaque nucl\u00e9aire contre l’Iran, a \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 comme une des causes<\/a> des ennuis qu’a connus l’ancien secr\u00e9taire au Foreign Office. Hier, dans sa conf\u00e9rence de presse, Tony Blair a \u00e9t\u00e9 press\u00e9 de questions sur ce commentaire de Jack Straw. Nous avons eu sa r\u00e9ponse, que nous rapporte Associated Press<\/a> et qu’on pourrait r\u00e9sumer par le mot absurd<\/em> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Prime Minister Tony Blair says that any consideration of a nuclear attack against Iran would be absolutely absurd, and said the issue had no bearing on his decision to demote his foreign secretary. Jack Straw, the former foreign secretary, had described alleged U.S. contingency plans for a tactical nuclear strike against Iran as completely nuts.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Blair previously had avoided any condemnation of the idea and defended the right of President Bush to hold all options in reserve in the showdown over Iran’s nuclear program.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Asked at a news conference whether he shared Straw’s view of any thought of a nuclear strike, Blair said: I don’t know anybody who has even talked or contemplated the prospect of a nuclear strike in Iran and that would be absolutely absurd, which may be a different way of saying what you have just quoted to me. But it (Straw’s reassignment) has got nothing to do with that. Look, in the end I’m afraid as prime minister you do reshuffle your Cabinet from time to time.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCertains vont penser que Tony Blair a l\u00e2ch\u00e9 du lest par rapport \u00e0 ses engagements aupr\u00e8s de, autour et derri\u00e8re l’ardeur du pr\u00e9sident am\u00e9ricain et de ses acolytes. Cela y ressemble. C’est l’affirmation la plus nette de Blair contre la perspective de la possibilit\u00e9 extr\u00eame d’attaque contre l’Iran. On peut raisonnablement y voir le signe de l’affaiblissement de sa position interne \u00e0 la suite des commentaires soulev\u00e9s par les rumeurs<\/a> d’intervention de Washington contre Jack Straw.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl est possible que le prochain dont Washington demande le d\u00e9part soit Tony Blair lui-m\u00eame.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 9 mai 2006 \u00e0 05H39<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les mots ont souvent le poids de l’importance des circonstances. Bref, fa\u00e7on de parler, m\u00eame s’ils sont courts ils en disent long. Le mot nuts, bref commentaire de Jack Straw sur la possibilit\u00e9 \u00e9voqu\u00e9e d’une attaque nucl\u00e9aire contre l’Iran, a \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 comme une des causes des ennuis qu’a connus l’ancien secr\u00e9taire au Foreign Office.… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5361,705,2773,3004,5360,3775],"class_list":["post-67540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-absurd","tag-blair","tag-iran","tag-nucleaire","tag-nuts","tag-straw"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67540"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67540\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}