{"id":67549,"date":"2006-05-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-11T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/11\/les-shoshones-bloquent-temporairement-divine-strake\/"},"modified":"2006-05-11T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-05-11T00:00:00","slug":"les-shoshones-bloquent-temporairement-divine-strake","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/11\/les-shoshones-bloquent-temporairement-divine-strake\/","title":{"rendered":"Les Shoshones bloquent (temporairement) Divine Strake<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les Shoshones bloquent (temporairement) Divine Strake<\/em><\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Les Indiens (ou Native Americans<\/em>) de la tribu des Shoshones<\/a> ont r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 bloquer au moins temporairement l’essai d’une explosion de 700 tonnes de nitrate d’ammonium dans le d\u00e9sert de l’Utah. Ce test \u00e9tait pr\u00e9vu pour le 2 juin, sous le nom de code de Divine Strake<\/a>. L’assignation d\u00e9pos\u00e9e par la communaut\u00e9 des Shoshones a conduit le juge ayant autorit\u00e9 dans la juridiction \u00e0 ordonner le retardement de l’essai jusqu’\u00e0 ce qu’il ait statu\u00e9 sur le cas.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

A propos de Divine Strake<\/em>, nous nous \u00e9tions interrog\u00e9s sur le choix \u00e9trange du nom de code donn\u00e9 \u00e0 cette exp\u00e9rimentation. Nous recommandons la lecture d’un commentaire de William Atkin, dans le Washington Post<\/em> du 4 avril<\/a> dernier. Atkin est un sp\u00e9cialiste de la m\u00e9thodologie des noms de code donn\u00e9s aux op\u00e9rations et autres activit\u00e9s militaires US. Il se penchait sur le choix de ce nom de code par le DTRA (Defense Threat Reduction Agency) qui dirige l’essai Divine Strake<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Ci-dessous, des extraits de son commentaire :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

« Does it need to be spelled out any clearer that nicknames shouldn’t be political or religious or politically incorrect, that it makes no sense, given the gigantic universe of words available (my Code Names book contained over 3,500 names currently in use), to have an entire test series devoted to weapons of mass destruction testing that uses the ‘Divine’ moniker?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» And it is a series: In addition to Divine Strake, the DTRA has conducted or is planning to conduct, I’ve now learned, tests and experiments called Divine Buffalo, Divine Invader, Divine Helcat, Divine Kingfisher, Divine Umpire, Divine Zorro, Divine Warhawk, Divine Albatross, and my favorite Divine Hates, a test, according to DTRA documents, that will gauge \u00ab\u00a0WMD production and storage tunnel complex functional defeat.\u00a0\u00bb That would something like destruction in English.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» In September 2001, right after 9\/11, when no doubt the highest paid person in the Pentagon named the upcoming operation in Afghanistan ‘Infinite Justice’ — U.S. Central Command is actually assigned the ‘IN’ two-letter block — a media uproar ensued when Muslim scholars and clerics objected to the name on the grounds that infinite justice can only by dispense by Allah. The operation nickname was changed to ‘Enduring Freedom.’<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» Do we really need ‘Divine’ anything to name our military activities? Of course there is a possibility that ‘Divine Strake’ will be abandoned and the brilliant minds will come up with something even worse.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 11 mai 2006 \u00e0 21H53<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les Shoshones bloquent (temporairement) Divine Strake Les Indiens (ou Native Americans) de la tribu des Shoshones ont r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 bloquer au moins temporairement l’essai d’une explosion de 700 tonnes de nitrate d’ammonium dans le d\u00e9sert de l’Utah. Ce test \u00e9tait pr\u00e9vu pour le 2 juin, sous le nom de code de Divine Strake. L’assignation d\u00e9pos\u00e9e… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3652,5274,5277,5275],"class_list":["post-67549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-atkin","tag-divine","tag-shoshones","tag-strake"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67549\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}